SpaceX and other space news updates

1,482,524 Views | 16335 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by will25u
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to joerobert_pete06 • 6:36p, 4/23/23
AG
joerobert_pete06 said:
bmks270 said:
Ag_of_08 said:
They bought two oil rigs for that stated purpose...



Oil platforms won't be stable being hit with millions of pounds of thrust.


I work a drill ship in GOM that can handle 3 million pounds of casing


33 Raptor engines is 16.8 million pounds of thrust. Not that it can't be done, but it's probably a lot more expensive and complex to do it on a floating platform.
Reply Quote
1 edit
OnlyForNow
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OKCAg2002 • 6:44p, 4/23/23
AG
All that **** that broke and is disconnected is now considered superlaforus…
Reply Quote
1
Premium
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:21p, 4/23/23
AG
They need to get someone to cut up all that stuff and sell it on eBay. I bet there would be a ton of people who would pay for chunks of concrete from the first launch.
Reply Quote
11
Centerpole90
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:27p, 4/23/23
AG
The wall at the end of the draworks looks like it was perforated by an A10. You can see where the shrapnel that penetrated the end wall dented the other surfaces from the inside out, and the in last picture of it you can see all the concrete stacked up on the INSIDE of the draworks.
Reply Quote
3
IronRed13
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OKCAg2002 • 7:40p, 4/23/23
AG

Reply Quote
2
Kceovaisnt-
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kenneth_2003 • 9:25p, 4/23/23
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:
will25u said:


W...O...W...
I think that lends credence to the damaged by flying concrete theory!


Those engines operate up to 350 bar chamber pressure as compared to 75 bar on the F1 engines on Saturn V. I'm pretty sure the engine outs that were observed were more like engine meltdowns. In either case, no more nozzles.

What a great shot by Tim Dodd!
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:54p, 4/23/23
AG
Reply Quote
2
Kenneth_2003
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmks270 • 11:34p, 4/23/23
AG
bmks270 said:
joerobert_pete06 said:
bmks270 said:
Ag_of_08 said:
They bought two oil rigs for that stated purpose...



Oil platforms won't be stable being hit with millions of pounds of thrust.


I work a drill ship in GOM that can handle 3 million pounds of casing


33 Raptor engines is 16.8 million pounds of thrust. Not that it can't be done, but it's probably a lot more expensive and complex to do it on a floating platform.


It's a moot point since the two drill ships have been sold, but you'd most likely launch over the moon pool.

It's a hole in the middle of the vessel that's open to the ocean.
Reply Quote
2
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kenneth_2003 • 11:59p, 4/23/23
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:
bmks270 said:
joerobert_pete06 said:
bmks270 said:
Ag_of_08 said:
They bought two oil rigs for that stated purpose...



Oil platforms won't be stable being hit with millions of pounds of thrust.


I work a drill ship in GOM that can handle 3 million pounds of casing


33 Raptor engines is 16.8 million pounds of thrust. Not that it can't be done, but it's probably a lot more expensive and complex to do it on a floating platform.


It's a moot point since the two drill ships have been sold, but you'd most likely launch over the moon pool.

It's a hole in the middle of the vessel that's open to the ocean.


And the ocean would be vaporized and pushed outward. Did you not see what it did to steel reinforced concrete? It left what looks like a 40 ft deep crater.
Reply Quote
1
Ducks4brkfast
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmks270 • 12:31a, 4/24/23
AG
bmks270 said:
Kenneth_2003 said:
bmks270 said:
joerobert_pete06 said:
bmks270 said:
Ag_of_08 said:
They bought two oil rigs for that stated purpose...



Oil platforms won't be stable being hit with millions of pounds of thrust.


I work a drill ship in GOM that can handle 3 million pounds of casing


33 Raptor engines is 16.8 million pounds of thrust. Not that it can't be done, but it's probably a lot more expensive and complex to do it on a floating platform.


It's a moot point since the two drill ships have been sold, but you'd most likely launch over the moon pool.

It's a hole in the middle of the vessel that's open to the ocean.


And the ocean would be vaporized and pushed outward. Did you not see what it did to steel reinforced concrete? It left what looks like a 40 ft deep crater.


Which is why it would never be done from a floating platform. Not even worth discussing.
Reply Quote
ABATTBQ11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmks270 • 12:39a, 4/24/23
AG
Nvmd
Reply Quote
1 edit
Kunkle for Congress TX-34
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Premium • 7:20a, 4/24/23
Premium said:
Elon will keep building it bigger and better
Make Starbase Great Again..Build Back Better?

How are we doing this?
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Kunkle for Congress TX-34 • 8:11a, 4/24/23
AG
LOL.



In all seriousness, stage 0 was not entirely a failure, after all. The fueling, quick disconnects, and some of the shielding did well.



Recognizing they were wrong about the concrete holding up for one launch (absent a water deluge, with plans to go to steel plating), that did some damage to tanks etc. but I think some of the panic in the commentariat is a bit overblown. They've come a long way, over the past 20 years!

Reply Quote
5
TexAgs91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 8:22a, 4/24/23
AG
In this era, any new rocket must be reusable. Otherwise it's doomed to failure before it's ever launched.
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ad Lunam
Reply Quote
1
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:30a, 4/24/23
Has there been anything on the debris field in the GOM?
Reply Quote
ABATTBQ11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 9:32a, 4/24/23
AG
"If you've ever had a Ferrari, that sucker's in the shop all the time "

Lol
Reply Quote
3
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 10:20a, 4/24/23
AG
nortex97 said:
LOL.



In all seriousness, stage 0 was not entirely a failure, after all. The fueling, quick disconnects, and some of the shielding did well.



Recognizing they were wrong about the concrete holding up for one launch (absent a water deluge, with plans to go to steel plating), that did some damage to tanks etc. but I think some of the panic in the commentariat is a bit overblown. They've come a long way, over the past 20 years!



Love the pictured article. Super cool.

So Elon was only 5 years late on his first Falcon timeline?

EDIT: I saw Elon say something like 'we take the impossible and make it late'

Reply Quote
3
1 edit
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:27a, 4/24/23
AG


This can be yours for $1,800. It only takes a month to print.
Reply Quote
8
NASAg03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45a, 4/24/23
Saw the launch right before heading to Moab Thursday morning, which was fitting considering the Mars vibes out there. Great to see how damage tolerant the system is, from the pad to engines to everything else.

For those saying this isn't a success, or a waste of resources and time, don't know much about engineering, especially modern engineering.

Analysis is worthless without real world data to close the feedback loop and update assumptions, constants, formulas, and everything else that goes into hand calcs, finite element models and simulations.

This includes stress, modal / vibe, thermal, fluid dynamics, avionics / controls, and fault tolerance. Even without digital data (which I'm sure they have terabytes of), the visual data allows analysts to update their inputs to obtain outputs that represent the real world.

Right now 1000's of SpaceX analysts and software engineers are updating models and lines of code with the latest data, which will help them better predict the next launch, and even predict failures on the latest tech builds being flown.

That's the value of testing and failing early. It's not so much to see what works in the real world. It's to update 1000's of models and simulations. Even if this didn't leave the pad, there's millions in savings for the next flight because of updates to analysis models.
Mike Shaw - Class of '03
Reply Quote
14
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:06p, 4/24/23
Reply Quote
lb3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to NASAg03 • 1:23p, 4/24/23
AG
NASAg03 said:
Right now 1000's of SpaceX analysts and software engineers are updating models and lines of code with the latest data, which will help them better predict the next launch, and even predict failures on the latest tech builds being flown.
I think you're overestimating how many engineers are working on Starship & Super Heavy.
Reply Quote
10
double aught
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lb3 • 1:52p, 4/24/23
AG

.
Reply Quote
10
NASAg03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lb3 • 3:12p, 4/24/23
lb3 said:
NASAg03 said:
Right now 1000's of SpaceX analysts and software engineers are updating models and lines of code with the latest data, which will help them better predict the next launch, and even predict failures on the latest tech builds being flown.
I think you're overestimating how many engineers are working on Starship & Super Heavy.
Haha, good point. They do work 80hr weeks so cut that number in half. 10% of your workforce as analysts and software engineers seems accurate though. We have 250 at Intuitive Machines, and there are at least 25 doing sims if not more.

I am curious how many people are working at SpaceX on Starship and Super Heavy, and what that breakdown looks like from a discipline standpoint.

I guess 1000 X $100K average salary is a bit much per year for one program...
Mike Shaw - Class of '03
Reply Quote
NASAg03
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:14p, 4/24/23
ispace is looking to land their first lander tomorrow morning.



Mike Shaw - Class of '03
Reply Quote
5
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to NASAg03 • 3:21p, 4/24/23
AG
NASAg03 said:
lb3 said:
NASAg03 said:
Right now 1000's of SpaceX analysts and software engineers are updating models and lines of code with the latest data, which will help them better predict the next launch, and even predict failures on the latest tech builds being flown.
I think you're overestimating how many engineers are working on Starship & Super Heavy.
Haha, good point. They do work 80hr weeks so cut that number in half. 10% of your workforce as analysts and software engineers seems accurate though. We have 250 at Intuitive Machines, and there are at least 25 doing sims if not more.

I am curious how many people are working at SpaceX on Starship and Super Heavy, and what that breakdown looks like from a discipline standpoint.

I guess 1000 X $100K average salary is a bit much per year for one program...
No idea but SpaceX directly employs over 1,800 in Cameron County (Boca Chica, Tx).
Reply Quote
notex
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PJYoung • 3:31p, 4/24/23
AG
And probably 10 or more just handling inventory etc. at Home Depot/Tractor Supply.
Reply Quote
1
Chipotlemonger
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PJYoung • 4:26p, 4/24/23
AG
That's crazy! Doesn't even include the facilities in McGregor.
Reply Quote
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:23p, 4/24/23
AG
Reply Quote
3
bthotugigem05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:27p, 4/24/23
AG
Completely expended Falcon Heavy
Reply Quote
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:41p, 4/24/23
AG
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/24/spacex-starship-explosion-spread-particulate-matter-for-miles.html
Reply Quote
bmks270
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:49p, 4/24/23
AG
There will be a lot of resistance to launch 2.


"In reality, following the test flight and explosion, people in Port Isabel reported broken windows in their businesses, shaking windows at their homes, and dust and particulate matter that coated their homes, schools and land unexpectedly, according to Cortez."
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
OKCAg2002
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:44p, 4/24/23
AG
Yeah, the environmental impact to both the immediate and surrounding area isn't unnoticed. SpaceX better have good lawyers.
Reply Quote
Jock 07
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:49p, 4/24/23
AG
While not necessarily relevant I figured I'd share some shots I have from when firefly alpha was terminated in Sept 21. It started to tilt as well but never made an entire rotation from what I recall. Firefly used a legacy FTS that is used on MMIII launches that is controlled by the ROPS. I believe SpaceX designed their own system.



Reply Quote
2
Teslag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bmks270 • 10:02p, 4/24/23
AG
bmks270 said:
There will be a lot of resistance to launch 2.


"In reality, following the test flight and explosion, people in Port Isabel reported broken windows in their businesses, shaking windows at their homes, and dust and particulate matter that coated their homes, schools and land unexpectedly, according to Cortez."


I'm sure it will be fine Mr Bezos
Reply Quote
6
hph6203
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jock 07 • 11:45p, 4/24/23
AG
Swim little buddy, you'll get there first and create the next generation!
Reply Quote
3
First Page Last Page
Page 261 of 467 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.