Hunter Biden. That's what is giving me confidence in November.
aggiehawg said:Have to say, either the Dems have an elaborate plant scenario going on and have for 10 months, the numbers of Dems and non-voters in 2016 numbers are staggering to me.TacosaurusRex said:
How does one go from being so disinterested or disaffected as not to vote in 2016, to standing in line to show up at Trump rallies??
Gotcha...when I see AZ, MI, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, and WI all being counted as red, it tends to give me the vibe of this just another fake poll.will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
Difference being the lack of a Biden ground game in those states, with the possible exception of Pennsylvania. Ed Rendell still runs that state's Dems. And he's never been shy about paying for votes using walking around money. He actually chided Hillary in 2016 on not putting enough cash out to voters in 2016.Silvertaps said:Gotcha...when I see AZ, MI, MN, NC, NV, OH, PA, and WI all being counted as red, it tends to give me the vibe of just another fake poll.will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
Don't think the NC early vote is great for Trump, but it is relatively in line with 2016 where Trump won. Big D gap, just need Rs to close it over next 2 weeks.barnyard1996 said:From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
barnyard1996 said:From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
Republicans traditionally vote on election day, while Dems vote early.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
AG 2000' said:Republicans traditionally vote on election day, while Dems vote early.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
They expected an even larger gap this year with Covid fears on the left.
There's folks crunching the numbers on voter registration vs. ballots cast in places like PA that are saying things look good for Trump.
It should also be a tell that Obama is going to Philly this week to try and campaign for Biden - that's a Dem stronghold but underperforming even their 2016 numbers.
The breakdown between early voting in person and vote by mail though is helpful. The thing is that the GOP has gotten the message out not to trust your vote to postal fraud.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
Thanks.
FL:
53.6% Democrat (vs 48.6% in 2016)
39.6% Republican (vs. 40.3% in 2016)
Do the county details shed more light on it? E.g. high number of ballots returned from Miami-Dade and it's expected that it will slow down dramatically? I haven't drilled into the county details. At state level, I don't see how it looks good for Trump.
You must be in Fairfield. You can think my mom for all those signs.CoachO_08 said:
Went for a run through my Houston suburb last night and the unofficial count was:
53 homes with visible support for Trump(signs/flags)
4 homes for Biden-one of which is a super Karen that lives two doors down.
Looking like the burbs are gonna go BIGLY for Trump!
Early in person voting started today in FL. D's were forecasted to mail vote 2 to 1.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
Thanks.
FL:
53.6% Democrat (vs 48.6% in 2016)
39.6% Republican (vs. 40.3% in 2016)
Do the county details shed more light on it? E.g. high number of ballots returned from Miami-Dade and it's expected that it will slow down dramatically? I haven't drilled into the county details. At state level, I don't see how it looks good for Trump.
barnyard1996 said:Early in person voting started today in FL. D's were forecasted to mail vote 2 to 1.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:From what I have read PA is one that is up in the air, but FL, AZ, NC, FL, WI, MI looking good for Trump.Gigemags382 said:barnyard1996 said:GIve me an example.Gigemags382 said:will25u said:It is just using TargetSmart data to show where the states are currently with EV/AB.Silvertaps said:I'm all about this map being the end result, but come on...that's a bit over the top on optimism.will25u said:
When I look at Target Smart (I've only given it a cursory look a few times), it looks awful for Trump on the surface. Is there underlying county information or something that indicates it's actually looking good for Trump? I seem to be overlooking something.
PA 70.6% Democrat / 23.6 % Republican / 5.8% Unaffiliated with close to 10x votes compared to 2016.
I may be completely overlooking/misunderstanding data on the site. So just seeking understanding.
Thanks.
FL:
53.6% Democrat (vs 48.6% in 2016)
39.6% Republican (vs. 40.3% in 2016)
Do the county details shed more light on it? E.g. high number of ballots returned from Miami-Dade and it's expected that it will slow down dramatically? I haven't drilled into the county details. At state level, I don't see how it looks good for Trump.
R's have crushed it in voter registration in both NC and FL.