maybe...and Luke will be there waiting for you.Prognightmare said:
Am I going to hell for laughing at that?
If you know the history of South Africa, they did the first with very extreme prejudice.FrioAg 00 said:
If he wants to live in a place that doesn't spread trash on the ground, he's going to need to first build a wall to keep the trash spreaders out of his defined area
Second, he's going to need to establish the necessary leverage to mitigate trash spreaders from spreading it in a way that spills over to his area. This could be a financial reward (though the cost are theoretically limitless) or it could be the ability to do harm to those that pose a threat to his way of like (call it sanctions or military capabilities)
If he's unwilling to change his approach to incorporate those first 2 points, he will not be able to live in a trash contained area
Enlightened outlook, I happen to agree. Sometimes the non-pc arrangements are actually the best bad arrangement; much like keeping middle eastern dictators in power.FrioAg 00 said:
I do. And that nation prospered for decades during the middle of a time the overall contenent was a disaster.
Folks benefited from the productivity - on both sides of the boundaries (physical and not)
Then they removed those boundaries and the value is quickly disappearing.
Zombie Jon Snow said:The Catalyst said:
This it is crazy!!
that's the same BSC loon that suggested white men need to stay away from Captain Marvel movie. Great plan genius. Alienate the ONLY constant fanbase for superhero/comic movies.
Of course SHE would also suggest ****ting all over your own city.