I don't think he would have conspicuously referenced Sussman's delivery of the same false information to the CIA in the EDVA when that was not a fact necessary to charging him in the District of Columbia.
— shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) November 12, 2021
None of that is consistent with "tidying up."
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,775,822 Views |
49465 Replies |
Last: 45 min ago by Ellis Wyatt
Kash Patel just revealed something interesting on @EpochTVus. Kash did not know there were additional Danchenko interviews.
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) November 13, 2021
That means the FBI lied to Nunes, Graham, Trump and most likely also Horowitz.
Anyone at the FBI going to get indicted for lying to Congress and the IG?
If you recall that FBI mystery man Joe Pientka ordered a "Human Source Validation Review" (HSVR) for Steele in early Nov. 2016 after Pientka found a lot of inconsistencies that didn't match up with what he was seeing. Pientka testified in his Senate deposition that this Review was cancelled by Bill Priestap, and Peter Strzok.will25u said:Kash Patel just revealed something interesting on @EpochTVus. Kash did not know there were additional Danchenko interviews.
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) November 13, 2021
That means the FBI lied to Nunes, Graham, Trump and most likely also Horowitz.
Anyone at the FBI going to get indicted for lying to Congress and the IG?
During the first week of February 2017, not long after the first Danchenko interview in early January, Priestap finally reauthorized the HSVR for Steele in February 2017 that he had cancelled when Pientka first ordered it in early November 2016.
Going back re-reading this IG report, There is so much fluff work Horowitz completely ignores the entire sequence of events that lead up to the re-opening of the HSVR, never commenting on fact that the HSVR was restarted shortly after the first interview of Danchenko. The only reference to any motivation for restarting the HSVR is the brief mention in the footnote, with no reference to the Danchenko interview. and this one paragraph in the report.
It's almost like they though Danchenko was completely irrelevant to this entire thing and now the SOB is indicted for lying in multiple interviews with the FBI. Neither Horwitz or Mueller say a work about Danchenko lying or misleading or anything. A complete whitewash on Danchenko, until Durham got the declassified files from Ratcliffe and unearths all this.
Another thing Horowitz reported as a point of controversy over the HSVR report said that it had not corroborated Steele's garbage. If there were corroboration it would be noted. But if the HSRV reviewed second source reporting of the same information obtained from the CHS (Danchenko) and came up with a finding of "lack of corroboration" that only means that there was no such second source reporting found, and not that the primary source information that was under review leaving it open and unanswered that the dossier wasn't necessarily inaccurate. Both Mueller and Horowitz just let is stand and they continued to use it in the FISA court.
Remember that Kash Patel went to work for DOD but in fact was working with Ratcliffe to unearth as much as they could that Haspel and Wray had been hiding. Patel pointed out to Ratliffe that Danchenko's first interview was in the 57 page "Electronic Communication" supposedly written by Senior FBI Analyst Brian Auten. That EC states at the start that David Laufman, who in 2016 helped oversee the Hillary Clinton use of a private email server in 2016 and was handing out immunity like tic tacs. Laufman became the Chief of the Counterespionage and Export Control Section of the National Security Division of DOJ, gave Danchenko a Proffer Agreement at the beginning of his first interview.
All this by Laufman was kept under wraps so no one had an understanding of the precise nature and limitations of this Proffer Agreement. But Patel's finding revealed the is was a "use immunity" Proffer. Aggiehawg loves to call it a "Queen for a Day" letter. The terms of such a letter typically provide that the interview is taking place under ground rules that prevent the prosecution from using the actual statements made by the person being interviewed in any case later brought against that person. But that goes out the window if you lie to the FBI, which is what Durham is nailing Danchenko on. SO Danchenkos interview basically turned into a confession he's caught dead to right on. And with the length of that indictment and all the people that are also implicated in it, Durham is going to get his pound of flesh.
Danchenko is currently represented by a D.C. attorney named Mark Schamel. The name of Danchenko's defense attorney who went with him to his January 2017 interview is redacted in the EC, but Schamel's name fits the number of characters under the redaction mark according to a couple of Twitter Sleuths . So, for now I'm going to say that Schamel was with Danchenko in the January 2017 interviews, and Schamel was who negotiated the Queen for a Day letters with Laufman.
Another thing to note is that the minute Durham took over and started searching upstream from all these Danchenko interviews that had been kept under wraps, David Laufman decided it was time to retire and go into private practice in Feb 2018. He knew the cat was out of the bag and he exited stage left.
I know a ot of us, myself included have been frustrated as hell with the slow pace of Durham but if you really look deep into this with this new indictment and then go back and match up Durham's findings against the Horowitz and Mueller reports, you can see just how murkey these swamp waters are and how much crap he's had to weed through. Had it not been for Ratcliffe and Kash Patel, all of this would still be buried.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
How soon until we see action Against Fiona Hill. She's definitely lied to congress, curious if she's lied to Durham?
Her nonsense that she only learned of what was going on about the dossier until she saw it in the press and then it being published by Buzzfeed? Durham has already determined that it Was Hill who introduced Charles Dolan to Danchenko and Danchenko to Steele. FIona Hill is neck deep in this Dossier nonsense, and so is the Brookings Institute.
I'm going back through Fiona Hill's closed door testimony (400+ pages) and she lies repeatedly to congress. If she told Durham the same things, she's toast or She Flips on those above her, and given her status that not too many levels to the top.
Her nonsense that she only learned of what was going on about the dossier until she saw it in the press and then it being published by Buzzfeed? Durham has already determined that it Was Hill who introduced Charles Dolan to Danchenko and Danchenko to Steele. FIona Hill is neck deep in this Dossier nonsense, and so is the Brookings Institute.
I'm going back through Fiona Hill's closed door testimony (400+ pages) and she lies repeatedly to congress. If she told Durham the same things, she's toast or She Flips on those above her, and given her status that not too many levels to the top.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
God help this country. So much corruption.
I swear we need to move our nation's capitol to flyover country and cut all non DoD by 80%
I swear we need to move our nation's capitol to flyover country and cut all non DoD by 80%
Layne Staley said:
God help this country. So much corruption.
I swear we need to move our nation's capitol to flyover country and cut all non DoD by 80%
We could probably cut DoD significantly if we got an honest, thorough audit. My guess is 80% nonexistent soldiers is the tip of the iceberg.
From Hill, is it only a hop, skip and a jump to Bolton? He hired her.sicandtiredTXN said:
How soon until we see action Against Fiona Hill. She's definitely lied to congress, curious if she's lied to Durham?
Her nonsense that she only learned of what was going on about the dossier until she saw it in the press and then it being published by Buzzfeed? Durham has already determined that it Was Hill who introduced Charles Dolan to Danchenko and Danchenko to Steele. FIona Hill is neck deep in this Dossier nonsense, and so is the Brookings Institute.
I'm going back through Fiona Hill's closed door testimony (400+ pages) and she lies repeatedly to congress. If she told Durham the same things, she's toast or She Flips on those above her, and given her status that not too many levels to the top.
nortex97
Thanks for the link, good summary.
Thanks for the link, good summary.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
I hope they go after her and threaten her with a decade in the fed pen. Let's see if she'll take that for the team.
Actually she's a two for. McMaster hired her originally when he fired all Flynn's people, and when McMaster was out, Hill was going to leave but Bolton convinced her to stay over.aggiehawg said:From Hill, is it only a hop, skip and a jump to Bolton? He hired her.sicandtiredTXN said:
How soon until we see action Against Fiona Hill. She's definitely lied to congress, curious if she's lied to Durham?
Her nonsense that she only learned of what was going on about the dossier until she saw it in the press and then it being published by Buzzfeed? Durham has already determined that it Was Hill who introduced Charles Dolan to Danchenko and Danchenko to Steele. FIona Hill is neck deep in this Dossier nonsense, and so is the Brookings Institute.
I'm going back through Fiona Hill's closed door testimony (400+ pages) and she lies repeatedly to congress. If she told Durham the same things, she's toast or She Flips on those above her, and given her status that not too many levels to the top.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
I remember Making America Great Again
http://republicannewswatch.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Thunderstruck-RNW.mp4
http://republicannewswatch.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Thunderstruck-RNW.mp4
X was born on October 28, 2022 and should be a national holiday.
FBI Director Christopher Wray is testifying before the House Intelligence Committee tomorrow. There are a lot of questions in a new letter to Wray from top committee Republican Devin Nunes: pic.twitter.com/KJRmB0ahsS
— Byron York (@ByronYork) November 15, 2021
Boasberg again? 😬 pic.twitter.com/FALk7XE2Hr
— Whispers of Dementia (@mgEyesOpen) November 16, 2021
2) As he asks "where did much of the press go wrong?" @bgrueskin inadvertently engages in exactly what he purports to criticize:
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 16, 2021
"There is no doubt that Mr. Trump had long curried Mr. Putin’s favor"
4) "Addressing the shortcomings over the dossier doesn’t mean ignoring the corruption and democracy-shattering conduct that the Trump administration pushed"
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 16, 2021
Media never cared about truth.
But they do care that they've been exposed as the IC stenographers they've always been.
Conflict of interest perhaps?will25u said:Boasberg again? 😬 pic.twitter.com/FALk7XE2Hr
— Whispers of Dementia (@mgEyesOpen) November 16, 2021
For others like me with bad memory he is the judge that gave Clinesmith probation for doctoring evidence and submitting it for a FISA warrant.will25u said:2) As he asks "where did much of the press go wrong?" @bgrueskin inadvertently engages in exactly what he purports to criticize:
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 16, 2021
"There is no doubt that Mr. Trump had long curried Mr. Putin’s favor"4) "Addressing the shortcomings over the dossier doesn’t mean ignoring the corruption and democracy-shattering conduct that the Trump administration pushed"
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 16, 2021
Media never cared about truth.
But they do care that they've been exposed as the IC stenographers they've always been.
James E. Boasberg is a traitor.
from the article
The Democratic Party leadership, leftist progressives and legacy media are corrupt beyond redemption.Quote:
The judge responsible for punishing an attorney who helped the FBI abuse its powers to target a political campaign and then a presidency with a collusion hoax that poisoned our politics for years is concerned about the criminal's personal search for meaning? Instead of community service, perhaps Judge Boasberg should have just ordered Clinesmith to live, laugh and love.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Profane words.
Great, James Boasberg is the Judge who ruled that every single word of the Comey memos should be concealed from the public: https://t.co/BIyAefy7jS https://t.co/ObLzKOqf70
— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) December 20, 2019
Quote:
democracy-shattering conduct that the Trump administration pushed
I've yet to see 1 single person follow this type of statement with an actual, verifiable example. Like every single other liberal accusation lodged towards non-liberals, it is 100% projection of what it means/is to be a liberal.
Staff - take out the trash.
A Curiously Random Coincidence Keeps Repeatinghttps://t.co/vbu9xu62TE
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) November 16, 2021
#Durham This thread is aging well… https://t.co/VXpdfn0ynQ
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) November 16, 2021
FJB said:Conflict of interest perhaps?will25u said:Boasberg again? 😬 pic.twitter.com/FALk7XE2Hr
— Whispers of Dementia (@mgEyesOpen) November 16, 2021
Re Carter Page case v. Comey et. al.
— shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) November 17, 2021
Judge Boasberg recused himself earlier today, and the case was reassigned.
The new judge who will preside over the case -- Hon. Timothy Kelly.
Trump appointee.
I'm shocked. Like for real.will25u said:FJB said:Conflict of interest perhaps?will25u said:Boasberg again? 😬 pic.twitter.com/FALk7XE2Hr
— Whispers of Dementia (@mgEyesOpen) November 16, 2021Re Carter Page case v. Comey et. al.
— shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) November 17, 2021
Judge Boasberg recused himself earlier today, and the case was reassigned.
The new judge who will preside over the case -- Hon. Timothy Kelly.
Trump appointee.
Not widely reported today - Judge Kelly recused himself from the Carter Page v. James Comey case this morning. The case was reassigned to Judge Dabney Friedrich.
— shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) November 18, 2021
Caution is urged until tomorrow morning.
Is it known why Kelly recused himself?
Passing this case around like a hot potato
This Page v Comey lawsuit under discovery is likely to be a toxic waste dump of corruption and these justices are looking for any level of conflict of interest to avoid getting tied to it.
This Page v Comey lawsuit under discovery is likely to be a toxic waste dump of corruption and these justices are looking for any level of conflict of interest to avoid getting tied to it.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,896
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Caution is urged until tomorrow morning"...why is that?
Sorry. Still on my first cup of coffee.
Sorry. Still on my first cup of coffee.
Friedrich is also a Trump appointee. She's pretty exceptional, imho.
No idea on the two recusals but remember everyone (meaning 95% of Dems) in DC is married to/inbred professionally with someone this case is touching on. It's entirely possible recusal would be preferred for some of their partisans in black robes vs. having to take orders on how to dispose of this stuff.
No idea on the two recusals but remember everyone (meaning 95% of Dems) in DC is married to/inbred professionally with someone this case is touching on. It's entirely possible recusal would be preferred for some of their partisans in black robes vs. having to take orders on how to dispose of this stuff.
I imagine they'd be partly reviewing the results of their own previous rulings.
You basing that opinion on Judge Dabney shredding the Concord Russia Russia Russia parties and giving Magoo Mueller everything he asked for?Quote:
She's pretty exceptional, imho.
#Durham disagreed in 2019 with IG Horowitz about “some conclusions as to predication + how the FBI (Russia) probe was opened.” Two years, at least 15 subpoenas later, Durham’s team has even more evidence. This still relevant 2020 thread analyzes anomalies in FBI memo #July272016 https://t.co/lWeqi7VVpZ
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) November 18, 2021
Thread.
And also if you are interested in how the left views the Durham investigation, check out @emptywheel's Twitter.
And also if you are interested in how the left views the Durham investigation, check out @emptywheel's Twitter.
Which should lead any reasonable observer to realize that Durham has permission to use the sequestered evidence from the @carterwpage FISA.
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) November 22, 2021
FISC Judge Boasberg authorized DOJ to use the evidence to prosecute people involved in the case.#ButNothingsHappening https://t.co/KZNFhhoNAK
Certainly, he had to use sequestered evidence to even file the indictment, no? I can't imagine this being an issue.will25u said:
Thread.
And also if you are interested in how the left views the Durham investigation, check out @emptywheel's Twitter.Which should lead any reasonable observer to realize that Durham has permission to use the sequestered evidence from the @carterwpage FISA.
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) November 22, 2021
FISC Judge Boasberg authorized DOJ to use the evidence to prosecute people involved in the case.#ButNothingsHappening https://t.co/KZNFhhoNAK
It isn't, Empty Wheel is making an Empty Argument as she always does. Empty Wheel is a Louise Mensch mouthpiece.VegasAg86 said:Certainly, he had to use sequestered evidence to even file the indictment, no? I can't imagine this being an issue.will25u said:
Thread.
And also if you are interested in how the left views the Durham investigation, check out @emptywheel's Twitter.Which should lead any reasonable observer to realize that Durham has permission to use the sequestered evidence from the @carterwpage FISA.
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) November 22, 2021
FISC Judge Boasberg authorized DOJ to use the evidence to prosecute people involved in the case.#ButNothingsHappening https://t.co/KZNFhhoNAK
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
earlier today, @walkafyre, who is more accurately wizardfyre, suggested that the redacted SSA in this nearly totally redacted 302 of May 15, 2017 was SSA Ryan James, who may have been inventorying Comey. There's a reason for this seemingly magical guess. pic.twitter.com/MqYf8YcAaY
— Stephen McIntyre (@ClimateAudit) November 22, 2021
Cracking up, too funny
FRONTLINE with a now 'free' documentary... you get what you pay for. No integrity, no shame with Frontline making this free on youtube 10/19/21just a month ago. For a good laugh and sudden loss of any remaining respect for PBS Frontline click the link:
FRONTLINE with a now 'free' documentary... you get what you pay for. No integrity, no shame with Frontline making this free on youtube 10/19/21just a month ago. For a good laugh and sudden loss of any remaining respect for PBS Frontline click the link:
Habanero Guero
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
64
Nonregdrummer09
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
35