Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,776,995 Views |
49465 Replies |
Last: 11 hrs ago by Ellis Wyatt
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,897
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope someone shares that clip!aggiehawg said:
LOL. Cruz just crushed her.
I'm hopeful it's because Barr is waiting to spring the traps simultaneously. Wishful thinking, I know.
Remember when CBS said they were going to fully support Atkisson's efforts to find out what happened, then jettisoned her overboard forcing her to set up a GoFundMe page to finance her litigation?
The media are the enemy of the State and should be treated as such.
Remember when CBS said they were going to fully support Atkisson's efforts to find out what happened, then jettisoned her overboard forcing her to set up a GoFundMe page to finance her litigation?
The media are the enemy of the State and should be treated as such.
Participating casually in lawfare by dragging out due process. Life is finite. Holding defendants in a legal limbo is not ethical unless there is serious need to do so for the purpose of justice being done.
Yep. Sickening.MouthBQ98 said:
Participating casually in lawfare by dragging out due process. Life is finite. Holding defendants in a legal limbo is not ethical unless there is serious need to do so for the purpose of justice being done.
Agreed. The arguments at mandamus had people uncertain about what would happen, but the court's actions up to and after showed they weren't happy with Sullivan. The granting of the rehearing en banc certainly gave pause to those who thought it was over, but, once again, the court's actions sure seem to indicate they are not happy with Sullivan.JJMt said:
I actually find that encouraging from the CtApp. Sounds like they may be leaning to forcing Sullivan to recuse, and then allowing his replacement to dismiss. That way they don't have to rule on the merits of dismissal. It's a weak thing to do, but good news for Flynn (assuming that I'm reading the tea leaves right in interpreting their questions).
Just tuned in. Yates obviously knew questions to be asked by Democrats.
Booker just praised Yates for refusing to enforce Trump's " illegal Muslim Ban", you know the one upheld by SCOTUS.
That also wasn't a Muslim ban. Dems are so consistently dishonest.
Spartacus making up BS.
Yates knew she would be asked "what would you do moving forward"
She also knew all questions about AJ Barr were coming.
Yates knew she would be asked "what would you do moving forward"
She also knew all questions about AJ Barr were coming.
Oh boy, Flynn judge Sullivan may just wind up having to explain why he shouldn't have recused.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1291045947607326722.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1291045947607326722.html
akm91 said:Hope someone shares that clip!aggiehawg said:
LOL. Cruz just crushed her.
Yes, I'm at a Dr.'s appointment and unable to watch today's proceeding.
Glad to at least get your posts
Haven't found a clip yet but I'll paraphrase.ccatag said:akm91 said:Hope someone shares that clip!aggiehawg said:
LOL. Cruz just crushed her.
Yes, I'm at a Dr.'s appointment and unable to watch today's proceeding.
Glad to at least get your posts
Cruz: When did you first become aware that the Obama administration was surveilling the Trump campaign?
Yates: We never surveilled the Trump campaign. We had a FISA on Carter Page who was no longer on the Trump campaign.
Cruz: And what was the basis for the FISA on Carter Page?
Yates: Well, we knew the Trump campaign was open to receiving help from Russia while Carter Page...
Cruz: Can't have it both ways, Ms. Yates.
Right, but litigating this is just a delay to the outcome. This should not be happening in the first place.nortex97 said:
Oh boy, Flynn judge Sullivan may just wind up having to explain why he shouldn't have recused.
aggiehawg said:Haven't found a clip yet but I'll paraphrase.ccatag said:akm91 said:Hope someone shares that clip!aggiehawg said:
LOL. Cruz just crushed her.
Yes, I'm at a Dr.'s appointment and unable to watch today's proceeding.
Glad to at least get your posts
Cruz: When did you first become aware that the Obama administration was surveilling the Trump campaign?
Yates: We never surveilled the Trump campaign. We had a FISA on Carter Page who was no longer on the Trump campaign.
Cruz: And what was the basis for the FISA on Carter Page?
Yates: Well, we knew the Trump campaign was open to receiving help from Russia while Carter Page...
Cruz: Can't have it both ways, Ms. Yates.
Thanks for sharing!
Sorry - Cruz crapped the bed and I think Yates was very prepared to counter his questions.pacecar02 said:aggiehawg said:Haven't found a clip yet but I'll paraphrase.ccatag said:akm91 said:Hope someone shares that clip!aggiehawg said:
LOL. Cruz just crushed her.
Yes, I'm at a Dr.'s appointment and unable to watch today's proceeding.
Glad to at least get your posts
Cruz: When did you first become aware that the Obama administration was surveilling the Trump campaign?
Yates: We never surveilled the Trump campaign. We had a FISA on Carter Page who was no longer on the Trump campaign.
Cruz: And what was the basis for the FISA on Carter Page?
Yates: Well, we knew the Trump campaign was open to receiving help from Russia while Carter Page...
Cruz: Can't have it both ways, Ms. Yates.
He could have prepared much better and didn't move the needle AT ALL in exposing Yates' involvement. I'm a bit disappointed in that exchange.
She was lying and he exposed her lying.
Sure is isn't it...policywonk98 said:aggiehawg said:
Flynn wrote an op-ed. Read the whole thing.
LINK
Flynns entire op-ed is.....familiar.
From whom?Secolobo said:Sure is isn't it...policywonk98 said:aggiehawg said:
Flynn wrote an op-ed. Read the whole thing.
LINK
Flynns entire op-ed is.....familiar.
I must have missed something......
The "other" thread.
/Sorry, supposed to be to Ms. Hawg./
/Sorry, supposed to be to Ms. Hawg./
Oh. I don't follow that thread.
It's been long suspected that Flynn was part of "the group of 10" and his OP ed writing styles and wording are very similar.
First time poster, but have been following this thread since about Page 15.
One of the most maddening responses over and over by these "Career Public Servants" that Sen. Hawley does a good job of pointing out is the BS response of "Knowing now, what I didn't know then, I would not have done.... Fill in the blank".
That is the lamest/ deflecting blame response that only someone who has been in government their whole life & has never been held accountable for anything in their career can say with a straight face. The complete lack of second guessing anything that was put in front of these people & rubber stamped to continue on is the exact reason the government should be in charge of as few things as possible.
I hope Durham finds everything on anyone from either side who was pushing false agendas & I hope they have their lives destroyed like they have done to countless others in their "Public Service" fraud careers.
One of the most maddening responses over and over by these "Career Public Servants" that Sen. Hawley does a good job of pointing out is the BS response of "Knowing now, what I didn't know then, I would not have done.... Fill in the blank".
That is the lamest/ deflecting blame response that only someone who has been in government their whole life & has never been held accountable for anything in their career can say with a straight face. The complete lack of second guessing anything that was put in front of these people & rubber stamped to continue on is the exact reason the government should be in charge of as few things as possible.
I hope Durham finds everything on anyone from either side who was pushing false agendas & I hope they have their lives destroyed like they have done to countless others in their "Public Service" fraud careers.
And those are things civilians (non-government workers) could never get away with claiming. "Intent" and "if I had known..." if it's illegal, it's illegal. People need to go to jail.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,897
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
they're playing dumb because they know not a damn thing will happen to them.
They are playing dumb because that is their only defense, incompetency and stupidity is not a crime.Quote:
they're playing dumb because they know not a damn thing will happen to them.
The game plan is simple. dump all this on to the FBI and the underlings.
OPAG said:They are playing dumb because that is their only defense, incompetency and stupidity is not a crime.Quote:
they're playing dumb because they know not a damn thing will happen to them.
The game plan is simple. dump all this on to the FBI and the underlings.
Here's how the conversation likely went.
Hillary: I'm running for president how can I come out and say that I'm that computer, email and security clearance illiterate??
Lawyer: Because you will go to prison if you don't.
Hillary later that day:
Featured Stories
See All
27:36
9h ago
10k
5 Thoughts: Vanderbilt 86, No. 12 Texas A&M 84
by Luke Evangelist
4:34
9h ago
2.5k
Game Highlights: Vanderbilt 86, No. 12 Texas A&M 84
by Cade Bickham
Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends
by Jason Howell
9:18
22h ago
4.4k
aggiez03
No rationalization exists for No. 12 Texas A&M's 86-84 loss to Vandy
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
22