Way to go Anglicans. Jesus is now Transgender

2,174 Views | 24 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by AGC
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:11p, 11/28/22
AG
Major Christian University Says Jesus Had a 'Trans-Body' RedState
Reply Quote
1
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:12p, 11/28/22
AG
Reply Quote
2 edits
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:14p, 11/28/22
AG
Cambridge dean defends sermon that claimed Jesus had 'trans body' | KECI (nbcmontana.com)
Reply Quote
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:15p, 11/28/22
AG
Cambridge professor says it's 'legitimate' to believe Jesus had a 'trans body' | Washington Examiner
Reply Quote
Rocag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:53p, 11/28/22
AG
So if you follow it down the rabbit hole trying to figure out what the guy actually said it sounds as though he was giving a talk about artistic traditions and depictions of Jesus. I'm not sure he was actually arguing that Jesus was transgender, although that statement is certainly the more attention grabbing headline.
Reply Quote
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rocag • 9:58p, 11/28/22
AG
Rocag said:
So if you follow it down the rabbit hole trying to figure out what the guy actually said it sounds as though he was giving a talk about artistic traditions and depictions of Jesus. I'm not sure he was actually arguing that Jesus was transgender, although that statement is certainly the more attention grabbing headline.
Rabbit hole. Yeah, I'm sure that's all there is to it
Reply Quote
1 edit
AGC
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:00p, 11/28/22
AG
The Anglican Church in England is toast.
Reply Quote
4
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGC • 10:02p, 11/28/22
AG
AGC said:
The Anglican Church in England is toast.
Only took what, 500 years?

lol
Reply Quote
2
dead
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Captain Pablo • 10:16p, 11/28/22
AG
Do you disagree with Rocag?
Reply Quote
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dead • 10:35p, 11/28/22
AG
dead said:
Do you disagree with Rocag?
Yep. I think the artist was suggesting the possibility, at least according to some artistic interpretations

why? you don't think so?

I mean, the preacher said the art depicts Christ as a trans body

what's your take?
Reply Quote
1 edit
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dead • 10:38p, 11/28/22
AG
dead said:
Do you disagree with Rocag?
"In Christ's simultaneously masculine and feminine body in these works, if the body of Christ [is] as these works suggest the body of all bodies, then his body is also the trans body," Heath said, as quoted by the outlet.

What is your take on that?
Reply Quote
dead
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Captain Pablo • 10:50p, 11/28/22
AG
So you do agree with Rocag?

I'm not educated enough (at all) to have a meaningful opinion on the topic of interpreting 15th century Christian art.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGC • 8:44a, 11/29/22
AG
AGC said:
The Anglican Church in England is toast.
At this point it is closer to penicillin than toast.
Reply Quote
1
AGC
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 8:57a, 11/29/22
AG
nortex97 said:
AGC said:
The Anglican Church in England is toast.
At this point it is closer to penicillin than toast.


Nah, just burned white bread.

It is abundantly clear it will split with African and Asian congregants leading the way (like the Methodist church) while the old wypipo try to colonize their orthodoxy.
Reply Quote
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rocag • 11:22a, 11/29/22
AG
Rocag said:
So if you follow it down the rabbit hole trying to figure out what the guy actually said it sounds as though he was giving a talk about artistic traditions and depictions of Jesus. I'm not sure he was actually arguing that Jesus was transgender, although that statement is certainly the more attention grabbing headline.



Yeah I don't agree with that

He wasn't saying, affirmatively and with certainty that Jesus is transgender

He was basically saying that if those art works were accurate, then Jesus' body was "trans body", ie was man and woman, or was man, and became man and woman (the wound)

And the Dean backed him up

It was way more than just "hey look at these paintings"
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
Captain Pablo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dead • 11:24a, 11/29/22
AG
dead said:
So you do agree with Rocag?

I'm not educated enough (at all) to have a meaningful opinion on the topic of interpreting 15th century Christian art.


No
Reply Quote
Rocag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Captain Pablo • 11:27a, 11/29/22
AG
Were you able to find the full quote with context or are you relying on the small section of it quoted in the Daily Mail (which isn't exactly the most respected or unbiased source around)?
Reply Quote
1
NowhereMan
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:03p, 11/30/22
It is a sad pathetic church that was once great
Reply Quote
3
mesocosm
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:46p, 12/1/22
AG
meh. Saying that Jesus was trans is certainly more credible than saying he died and was resurrected
Reply Quote
dermdoc
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to mesocosm • 4:54p, 12/1/22
AG
mesocosm said:
meh. Saying that Jesus was trans is certainly more credible than saying he died and was resurrected
So people died and wrote books because of Jesus's death and resurrection?

And nobody ever wrote anything about Jesus being transgender?

Completely illogical
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Reply Quote
4
dead
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dermdoc • 5:00p, 12/1/22
AG
dermdoc said:
mesocosm said:
meh. Saying that Jesus was trans is certainly more credible than saying he died and was resurrected
So people died and wrote books because of Jesus's death and resurrection?

And nobody ever wrote anything about Jesus being transgender?

Completely illogical
You've searched all of the works written in the history of humanity and can confirm no one ever wrote about Jesus being transgender?
Reply Quote
dermdoc
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dead • 10:31a, 12/2/22
AG
Maybe's it is me but I would think it would have surfaced before.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Reply Quote
3
Sb1540
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to NowhereMan • 11:59a, 12/2/22
TrailerTrash said:
It is a sad pathetic church that was once great
It was a never a great church. Heretical from the beginning.
Reply Quote
2
Sb1540
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to mesocosm • 12:01p, 12/2/22
mesocosm said:
meh. Saying that Jesus was trans is certainly more credible than saying he died and was resurrected
Lol what a stupid take. Forests of literature for centuries on Christ's resurrection and the modern western man comes in with him being trans as more credible.
Reply Quote
6
AGC
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sb1540 • 12:36p, 12/2/22
AG
Orthodox Texan said:
TrailerTrash said:
It is a sad pathetic church that was once great
It was a never a great church. Heretical from the beginning.


Really? The one already existing when Augustine of Rome showed up (well before Henry)? Please tell me more about their early heresies.
Reply Quote
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.