Ok, what is your point though? I'm not going to watch a video but I assume this guy
pulled a list together from elsewhere and questions why more artwork wasn't preserved from the initial 200 years after the crucifixion/resurrection.
What is undeniable is that the faith did spread rapidly, throughout the Roman Empire during this period, and though largely suppressed/persecuted, Christian symbologies in general didn't include images of Christ, which the followers hadn't seen in person in general, of course, but rather used the fish symbol/others in underground/house churches/gatherings.
Not much actual artwork from such a group would be expected to survive, just as original writings from this period didn't either (copies of copies of manuscripts are all we really have).
After the
Edict of Milan of course we have a lot more material.