diehard03 said:
What does it say about us when we label God's creation in this way?
PabloSerna said:
I don't get labeling people as "demonic" and "harlots". I would say misguided and deceived.
I understand that this is a sad day for Argentina which is just the latest Latin American country to accept the lie that a new birth, a human baby, is a burden and impediment for women.
+++
In reading a little bit of the background, they have been pushing for this type of legislation for 30+ years. Many of the people who supported this law mistakenly think having access to this medical procedure (free and in a hospital) is a step towards women gaining more control over their bodies and improving their lives.
The Pope weighed in, tweeting: "The Son of God was born an outcast, in order to tell us that every outcast is a child of God." This is significant because it shines a light on the real issue facing young people, particularly young women, who find themselves pregnant and unmarried. The lie is the same as it ever was - that a child is a burden and will be an outcast. He states clearly that they are "a child of God." This is the crucial aspect that is a basis, in my opinion, about how abortion will end.
Planned Parenthood plays on this theme quite a bit and lays it on thick. When my then girlfriend (now wife) and I visited PP in Bryan, we were told about how difficult it would be for two 20 year old students to provide for a newborn, let alone finish college. The answer it would seem, is to terminate this pregnancy and wait until things are better, like after college, when we both have jobs, and are most likely married.
Lies, lies, and more lies. The fact of the matter is, very few relationships survive an abortion! Also, how presumptuous to think, "OK God, I've got everything under control, give me a baby now." Lest we think we can conceive a life on our own without resorting to artificial means? Not to mention that most couples resort to abortion as a last line of birth control. Abortion can have a devastating effect on a women's body when abortion is chosen as an answer to an unwanted pregnancy. Most couples never intended to have a child at the time of conception. So naturally their predisposition about having a child is skewed against the wonderful gift God has blessed them with - surprisingly no doubt! For newly married couples this is likely not the case. The news of new baby is a welcomed and a joyous event!
For older couples, it can be a trying moment. After our first baby, my wife got on the pill and I would use condoms or just "pull out" as they say - because we had bought into the lie. Seven years went by before baby #2 arrived. It was only because, we stopped believing the lie and trusted God. We choose to be open to the gift of life! After validating our marriage in the Church - it was just a year later when baby #2 came along. Two years after that, baby #3. Three years later, baby #4. After that, God blessed us with a child almost every two years until baby #8, about 12 years ago. Were there difficulties - sure. However, it is a matter of belief in God if you ask me - Does God give life or do we?
We followed the Natural Family Planning method the Catholic Church recommends for new couples. It begins with the basic understanding that God is the God of life. We are co-creators when we open up our marriage to God and the gift of life. We did abstain at times, and learned so much more about ourselves and the reproductive cycle. It deepened our marital love and our relationship with God! He never abandoned us and I can say without hesitation that it was a turning point in my faith journey.
I write all this to point out plainly that the end to abortion will not come from the courts or the legislature. It will come from a better understanding about the gift of life. It will end when good people come together to support new life because of the intrinsic value it brings to a society regardless of how it came into being. Undoubtedly it will be because man has rejected the lie and believed in the truth. The truth is God.
+pablo
Quote:
Yawn, John the Baptist called God's creation broods of vipers, and flipped tables in righteous indignation. Its calling a spade of spade, which i understand hardens back to a time of objectivism and not relativism
diehard03 said:Quote:
Yawn, John the Baptist called God's creation broods of vipers, and flipped tables in righteous indignation. Its calling a spade of spade, which i understand hardens back to a time of objectivism and not relativism
The fact that you are trying equate these 2 two things is evidence that you don't really care for the souls who are wrongly celebrating here.
Carry on.
Because your OP is provocative, not conversation-inducing. The OP is high on flair, but totally lacking in substance, and the attention is far more easily drawn to the diction because of it. If you want to talk about abortion, or this law in particular, you're going to have to put something out there to interact with beyond name-calling. This isn't the politics board.FalconAg06 said:
I'm not claiming to be Christ, just wondering why the focus has turned yet again to "how dare you" rather than "how dare the people holding a naked public dance to celebrate infanticide"
Quote:
Explain your point, Christ called Judas the Son of Perdition and said it was better had he not been born. Christ loved more perfectly than I could ever hope to love, yet still whirled the lash, literally, when needed.
I'm not claiming to be Christ, just wondering why the focus has turned yet again to "how dare you" rather than "how dare the people holding a naked public dance to celebrate infanticide"
Quote:
We must be compassionate and loving to the unwed mother who is staring down a road of fear and hardships, but I will not hold back one iota of truth in calling it what it is: EVIL OF THE WORST KIND, UNPARALLELED IN HISTORY.
diehard03 said:Quote:
Explain your point, Christ called Judas the Son of Perdition and said it was better had he not been born. Christ loved more perfectly than I could ever hope to love, yet still whirled the lash, literally, when needed.
I'm not claiming to be Christ, just wondering why the focus has turned yet again to "how dare you" rather than "how dare the people holding a naked public dance to celebrate infanticide"
Darg hit it well in the overall sentiment. But I will explain further.
Your post is not to lament the passing of the bill or even to cry over the lost children to come under this law. Your post was to call out the "harlots" and those celebrating. You also make no attempt to understand how someone can cheer such a thing. I, too, think that abortion is evil and abhorrent...but when someone cheers on evil activity, it's upon us to try and understand why. Why? Because they are creations of the Most High as well. Unless you have some evidence of demonic possession, I believe calling them demonic harlots would fail the "known by love" test.
To address the mores specific nature of the posts, you are equating Christ (and others) calling out self-righteous acts of piety by "believers". You are correct in that He deals with them more harshly than the world. He seems to treat the world as "they know not what they do". One might even say He deals with them compassionately.
Again, abortion is bad and this law passage is not a good thing. But lets dispense with name calling of those who celebrate it. It's not a good look for us.
Quote:
They are definitely demonic, and most likely harlots, I stand by both of those 100%. This isn't some nuanced article of faith someone can be ignorant of, it's the knowledge that abortion ends the life of a child. These women are dancing naked in the streets, while projecting demonic images on the capitol building. It is mind boggling to me that when presented with this information, the knee jerk result is "why are you saying they're bad".
This is the response you expected, isn't it?FalconAg06 said:
These women are dancing naked in the streets, while projecting demonic images on the capitol building. It is mind boggling to me that when presented with this information, the knee jerk result is "why are you saying they're bad".
dargscisyhp said:
Yea, where's the nudity, so I definitely don't look at that timestamp and skip over it instead?
Quote:
Do you think it's ever appropriate to say someone is demonic or a harlot?
Quote:
I didn't post the nudity for obvious reasons, but its there i can dm it to you if you're really interested
diehard03 said:Quote:
I didn't post the nudity for obvious reasons, but its there i can dm it to you if you're really interested
Don't be pedantic. You posted something and then referenced other sources to make your point, rather than it being part of your original post.
it's really confusing.
That's like saying how do you see if something is wet or has water on it. Bad human actors are in service of sin, whether they know it or not. Freedom exists in a constrained way - we choose our master. After that it narrows.AstroAg17 said:
What's the test for determining whether something is demonic or caused purely by bad human actors?
Again, the idea of this third party is what is obscured. The pagans worshipped gods, but these gods were gods of things. Mars wasn't only a divine person, he was War, personified. Anything a person sacrificed to have some achievement in war was sacrificed to Mars, and understood that way. We tend to be far too literalist when looking at how pagans thought and worshipped. Yes, they had explicit quid pro quo sacrifices. They also understood things in a broader sense, to serve or worship a concept the way we would say someone devoted themselves to their craft. That isQuote:
I feel like you're using sacrifice in a very liberal way. It is a sacrifice in some sense, but it's not an offering. To say that there is no difference between abortion and a sacrifice as a request for action is wrong, I think. Abortion is just an action that has a desired effect. I think a sacrifice implies an additional piece, that you are taking some action in the hopes that a third party will cause a desired effect.
There is also a definition of sacrifice where there is no third party. For example, if you sacrifice your weekend for your job. But that's not the definition you're using. You're mixing the two in an unclear way.