bpchas2 said:
Texas Monthly has an article on this. One of the Catholic scientists analyzed the material it was painted on and concluded that it was hemp, which is durable and was the "canvas" of choice in the mid 16th century. He also said that spectogfaphic images showed two paintings below this one. Also, the paint is flaking at a fold.
Around the time the miracle was supposed to have happened, it was referred to as the painting done by an Aztec artist named Marco. One priest writes that it was done by that artist "yesteryear." A couple of other priests decried the fact that it was being used to convert the Aztecs, calling it idolatry.
Hemp wouldn't have been available to the poor farmers of the area.
There isn't anything underneath it, as you can see through the canvas. There aren't any sections of paint flaking, as it would be impossible to paint without a bottom coating.
There are no brush strokes, even with analyzing it using the same technology NASA uses to process images from telescopes.
The stars on her robe line up exactly with the way the stars would have been positioned on that day, including the proper phase of the moon. Well, almost exactly. They are flipped as though they're being viewed from the heavens.
No one should have to work to survive. Your right to life should not depend solely on your ability to produce capital.