Paul added to Torah (baptism). Paul subtracted from Torah (circumcision).
Please show me the command to be baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost in the first 5 books of the Bible - what you call the Torah.agie95 said:
Paul added baptism?
Immersion (baptism) is a purely Jewish concept:
Women after childbirth or menstruation
A bride before her wedding
Priests (in the Temple) before divine service
Men on Kol Nidre (eve of Yom Kippur) (also optionally, before Shabbat)
For converts to Judaism
In preparation of a dead person for burial
For new kitchen utensils
In Jewish literature it is said that going through the split sea was an immersion.
Wasn't Yeshua immersed?
Paul did nothing of the sort.
If Paul got rid of circumcision, then Timothy got circumcised for nothing. In the Third Temple, if you are not circumcised in the flesh, you can't get in (Ezekiel 44:9).
Did Paul follow Torah? I provided several Scriptures which says he did. He called himself a pharisee late in his ministry. What do Pharisees do? Follow Torah.
What priesthood is ministering now? The one after the order of Melchizedek or Aaron?agie95 said:
Your ignorance is showing...
Genesis 14:8 - And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; now he was a priest of God Most High.
Hebrews 7:1 - For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham as he was returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him,
I am going to stop answering your questions. They are not genuine.
Says you. Paul says the priesthood now is after the order of Melchizedek, not Aaron. Jesus is the high priest.agie95 said:
These comments aren't germane to the topic. For the most part, I ignore retiredag.
Martin Q. Blank said:Says you. Paul says the priesthood now is after the order of Melchizedek, not Aaron. Jesus is the high priest.agie95 said:
These comments aren't germane to the topic. For the most part, I ignore retiredag.
He also gives several new commandments like baptism in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost which adds to the Torah. Also, directions on the Lord's supper.
Did Paul follow the Torah? Yes. He also changed it.
Quote:
Women after childbirth or menstruation
A bride before her wedding
Priests (in the Temple) before divine service
Men on Kol Nidre (eve of Yom Kippur) (also optionally, before Shabbat)
For converts to Judaism
In preparation of a dead person for burial
For new kitchen utensils
agie95 said:
It is real easy not to click. The less people post, the further down the line it goes. Hey, thanks for propping it up for me.
1) This has nothing to do with whether or not Paul followed Torah. As you've made it clear that you will not accept any deviation from that very limited question, you should probably hold yourself to the same standard.Quote:
People in general are against the Torah and Jews. People say they love Israel, they love Jews, but when you probe long enough, they really don't. They love the thought, but that is it. A holocaust/inquisition type of event will happen again. It is already started in France and Poland. Australia is wanting Jews to register to buy kosher meat. It is what it is, people just gonna hate.
Well, if you can really be objective you could see I accepted outside the lines as long as someone wasn't being obtuse. I answered somethings that were not germane to the op. So to say that I should hold myself to the same standard is a little off, I am following the same course throughout this post...as long as someone isn't be obtuse. I also have a right to defend myself, since he was calling me out, just as you are.RetiredAg said:1) This has nothing to do with whether or not Paul followed Torah. As you've made it clear that you will not accept any deviation from that very limited question, you should probably hold yourself to the same standard.Quote:
People in general are against the Torah and Jews. People say they love Israel, they love Jews, but when you probe long enough, they really don't. They love the thought, but that is it. A holocaust/inquisition type of event will happen again. It is already started in France and Poland. Australia is wanting Jews to register to buy kosher meat. It is what it is, people just gonna hate.
2) Are you implying that Marco doesn't like Jews? That's really the only logical inference considering you're responding to his post which is critical of you. If that's what you're implying, then that's as uncalled for as the joke he made, which I didn't see, but was apparently over the line. Criticism of a Jewish person is not antisemitism. Criticism of Israel is not antisemitism.
Just because you think it is, doesn't make it so. The term has been thrown out maliciously at people who are critical of Israeli policies. That's not antisemitic. It's become a term cheapened by it's rampant misuse, much like the term "racist".Quote:
Much criticism of Jewish people and of Israel, is antisemitic. I know you don't think so, but that doesn't make it so.
And yet you can't answer my posts. The student has become the teacher. shalomQuote:
That poster was just throwing stuff on the wall. He obviously didn't know somethings and was speaking out of ignorance.
No, it appears he isn't a fan of your hostile, condescending tone where you pretend to want discussion, but in fact just desire to preach down at others. Or how you start thread after thread about the same topic, never listening to objections and dismissing them as being "ignorant", "obtuse" or "antisemitic". As always, it's your tone that people find objectionable. If it were antisemitism, then Win At Life would face the same harshness, but he doesn't. Why? Because he engages people with respect. You do not.Quote:
It is quite clear that he doesn't like anything to do with Torah or anyone suggesting to follow it. That is antisemitism.
Who said it doesn't exist? I'm saying it's an overused and misused label, much like the term "racist" has become. Criticism isn't antisemitism. Marco said nothing antisemitic, yet you hurl that accusation (or imply that he's antisemitic).Quote:
When you live the live for a little while and feel the effects of it, it is a whole different perspective. One that you can't tell me doesn't exist.
You mentioned criticism of Israel often being the result of antisemitism. The criticism of Israel is predominantly regarding their oppressive policies. Opposing the actions and policies of the modern nation-state of Israel isn't antisemitic.Quote:
Policies? Who is talking policies? You are bringing something into this that wasn't even close to being discussed. Though if one is on the side of the Palestian's, I would expect anything different.
Why leave? Wouldn't it be easier to just soften your tone and engage others respectfully?agie95 said:
Fine, you won. I will never post again, I won't even visit the forum.
May each of you find the truth. Shalom aleichem.
RetiredAg said:Why leave? Wouldn't it be easier to just soften your tone and engage others respectfully?agie95 said:
Fine, you won. I will never post again, I won't even visit the forum.
May each of you find the truth. Shalom aleichem.
He isn't leaving.RetiredAg said:Why leave? Wouldn't it be easier to just soften your tone and engage others respectfully?agie95 said:
Fine, you won. I will never post again, I won't even visit the forum.
May each of you find the truth. Shalom aleichem.