People on this forum will disagree with me. But my argument is logical, and based in fact, not tradition or bigotry.
The Nuclear Family, where a child is preferably raised by his biological mother and father, is the most important, most wealth building invention ever devised. It has lead countless families to relative prosperity more than any other social construct or technological invention we have ever devised.
And, the above is not really opinion. All serious economists agree. All serious child psychologists and sociologists agree that children from a Nuclear Family have better lives and outcomes.
The Nuclear Family is sacrosanct. It is what has built the West. It is an important value driver for all societies that have achieved any form of comfort for working class people.
Sex is a powerful tool to keep the Nuclear Family in tact. Because a Nuclear Family drives such positive outcomes, a healthy sexual relationship between two parents can be a substantial driver for the positive outcomes for children. If sex is used as a tool to bind two child rearing parents together in a very trying job, it has a beneficial impact on our society.
SomEhow, in our society, this messAGe has been forgotten. Sex is now About personal pleasure over personal responsibility. Every single Thing that movEs sex further from a tool of successful child rearing and closer to an outlet for personal gratification is a Big Aggregate loss for the outcome of children.
So, thIs is an argument abouT sex confined within a monogamous, heterosexual relationship that is based on love and collective societal benefit. Zero percent of my argument is based on an appeal to religious authority or the tendency to experience disgust of some sub-set of the human population to such activities.
At some point, I truly believe this argument will go mainstream.
The Nuclear Family, where a child is preferably raised by his biological mother and father, is the most important, most wealth building invention ever devised. It has lead countless families to relative prosperity more than any other social construct or technological invention we have ever devised.
And, the above is not really opinion. All serious economists agree. All serious child psychologists and sociologists agree that children from a Nuclear Family have better lives and outcomes.
The Nuclear Family is sacrosanct. It is what has built the West. It is an important value driver for all societies that have achieved any form of comfort for working class people.
Sex is a powerful tool to keep the Nuclear Family in tact. Because a Nuclear Family drives such positive outcomes, a healthy sexual relationship between two parents can be a substantial driver for the positive outcomes for children. If sex is used as a tool to bind two child rearing parents together in a very trying job, it has a beneficial impact on our society.
SomEhow, in our society, this messAGe has been forgotten. Sex is now About personal pleasure over personal responsibility. Every single Thing that movEs sex further from a tool of successful child rearing and closer to an outlet for personal gratification is a Big Aggregate loss for the outcome of children.
So, thIs is an argument abouT sex confined within a monogamous, heterosexual relationship that is based on love and collective societal benefit. Zero percent of my argument is based on an appeal to religious authority or the tendency to experience disgust of some sub-set of the human population to such activities.
At some point, I truly believe this argument will go mainstream.
In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense -George Orwell, 1984, Part 1, Chapter 7