You have no idea what suffering people are enduring. Some people suffer materially, other spiritually. Money is irrelevant.
It's not celebrating that you are poor, sick or have been struck by some sort of calamity. It's about rejoicing in the faithfulness of God and His presence in your life regardless of your situation. Money or material wealth have nothing to do w/ that. Those are distractions of the world. Can they be used for good? Of course. Zacchaeus wasn't blessed w/ material wealth because he was a faithful servant of God. He had material wealth because he stole from the people. He was able to use those ill-gotten gains, though, to give half his money to the poor and pay back fourfold any person he cheated. That wealth, though, was not due to his faithfulness, and the poverty of those he ended up helping wasn't due to their lack of faith.Quote:
No, I do not rejoice in simple suffering. I will never celebrate infirmity, calamity, or poverty.
The widow with two coins gave all that she had. What do you suppose happened to her after that gift? Did she slowly and starve to death in sanctified suffering? Or did other people in turn assist her and provide for her? Christ after all said:Quote:The widow with two coins gave more than the rich people giving large sums of money. You seem to be under the impression that anyone here is saying it's wrong to be materially prosperous. That's not what we're saying. We're saying material wealth is not something we are to place our faith in, or that it's the result of a Christ-like life (and lack of wealth being the result of lack of faith). The rich young ruler had plenty. He kept the commandments, but when he was told to surrender it all, he refused. He placed his faith in himself to provide, not God.Quote:
Quote:
My "prosperity" gospel church teaches that exact same thing. The only difference is that they teach that if you are prosperous you are able to give more than if you are in lack.
Who wrote this? Just out of curiosity.Quote:No, I know what I'm talking about w/ regards to the prosperity gospel charlatans. As the woman who literally wrote the book on the prosperity gospel said:Quote:
Quote:
So it sounds as if you honestly have no idea what you're talking about, and instead are taking tweets 150 ofcharacters and assuming that it represents the whole theology.Quote:
Quote:
The prosperity gospel has taken a religion based on the contemplation of a dying man and stripped it of its call to surrender all. Perhaps worse, it has replaced Christian faith with the most painful forms of certainty. The movement has perfected a rarefied form of America's addiction to self-rule, which denies much of our humanity: our fragile bodies, our finitude, our need to stare down our deaths (at least once in a while) and be filled with dread and wonder. At some point, we must say to ourselves, I'm going to need to let go.
Quote:No, I'm not ignoring their example. These were men who were content in whatever they had, and their persecutions or lack of material wealth were not signs of a lack of faithfulness.Quote:
Quote:
And you ignore the example of Joseph, Danielle, and others who despite persecutions and a culture hostile to them were able to rise up to positions of authority. But then again, they were men who were more than simply competent, but strove to be excellent workers and managers.
The author of the article that is in the OP. Did you not read the article or any of the quotes in the OP? Or did you just instinctively jump in to defend this teaching without actually reading it?Quote:
Who wrote this? Just out of curiosity.
I skimmed through read the article. Frankly, I wasn't interested in this topic until Agliving06 chimed in.RetiredAg said:The author of the article that is in the OP. Did you not read the article or any of the quotes in the OP? Or did you just instinctively jump in to defend this teaching without actually reading it?Quote:
Who wrote this? Just out of curiosity.
FYI, the author is Kate Bowler. She had embraced this prosperity gospel false teaching at one point. She wrote the first comprehensive history of this teaching. https://www.amazon.com/Blessed-History-American-Prosperity-Gospel/dp/0190876735/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1521557334&sr=8-3&keywords=KATE+BOWLER
I don't think he really misrepresented this "movement". Also, does it give you no concern that this movement isn't rooted in the gospel of Jesus Christ, but in the "New Thought" movement (which was influenced by gnosticism) and, as Bowler says, "an American gospel of pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility."?Quote:
I skimmed through read the article. Frankly, I wasn't interested in this topic until Agliving06 chimed in.
Since I clearly am the only person who frequents this board who is associated with this movement, I felt the need to correct him when he misrepresented what I believe.
We spend more time in the gospels at my "heretical" church than I have in any of the countless other churches I've attended during my lifetime. Frankly, it's funny hearing the criticism coming from a guy who doesn't even really believe in the OT. What do you think Jesus was preaching from?RetiredAg said:I don't think he really misrepresented this "movement". Also, does it give you no concern that this movement isn't rooted in the gospel of Jesus Christ, but in the "New Thought" movement (which was influenced by gnosticism) and, as Bowler says, "an American gospel of pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility."?Quote:
I skimmed through read the article. Frankly, I wasn't interested in this topic until Agliving06 chimed in.
Since I clearly am the only person who frequents this board who is associated with this movement, I felt the need to correct him when he misrepresented what I believe.
You know, repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it any less of a lie. I absolutely do believe in the OT, but you prefer to deflect w/ petty lies.Solo Tetherball Champ said:We spend more time in the gospels at my "heretical" church than I have in any of the countless other churches I've attended during my lifetime. Frankly, it's funny hearing the criticism coming from a guy who doesn't even really believe in the OT. What do you think Jesus was preaching from?RetiredAg said:I don't think he really misrepresented this "movement". Also, does it give you no concern that this movement isn't rooted in the gospel of Jesus Christ, but in the "New Thought" movement (which was influenced by gnosticism) and, as Bowler says, "an American gospel of pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility."?Quote:
I skimmed through read the article. Frankly, I wasn't interested in this topic until Agliving06 chimed in.
Since I clearly am the only person who frequents this board who is associated with this movement, I felt the need to correct him when he misrepresented what I believe.
I apologize. Most of the time I say stuff like that about you I say it in jest (and I think you recognize that). Right now, I said that deliberately in order to prove a point. Just as you don't like seeing what you believe misrepresented, neither do I.Quote:You know, repeating a lie over and over again doesn't make it any less of a lie. I absolutely do believe in the OT, but you prefer to deflect w/ petty lies.Quote:Solo Tetherball Champ said:Quote:RetiredAg said:Quote:
Quote:
I skimmed through read the article. Frankly, I wasn't interested in this topic until Agliving06 chimed in.
Since I clearly am the only person who frequents this board who is associated with this movement, I felt the need to correct him when he misrepresented what I believe.
I don't think he really misrepresented this "movement". Also, does it give you no concern that this movement isn't rooted in the gospel of Jesus Christ, but in the "New Thought" movement (which was influenced by gnosticism) and, as Bowler says, "an American gospel of pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility."?
We spend more time in the gospels at my "heretical" church than I have in any of the countless other churches I've attended during my lifetime. Frankly, it's funny hearing the criticism coming from a guy who doesn't even really believe in the OT. What do you think Jesus was preaching from?
Skimming through some resources on new thought, I can see similarities. I can also see some significant differences as well.Quote:
Again, does it give you any concern that your "movement" is rooted in the "New Thought" movement, which was heavily influenced by gnosticism, and as the person who wrote the first comprehensive history of this movement said, "an American gospel of pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility"? Can you answer without deflections and lies? Is her understanding of the history of your "movement" wrong?
I don't believe AgLiving said anything about what you specifically believe. He made comments about prosperity gospel in general, but I don't see where he said anything that singled your particular beliefs out. You did, however, single mine out and lied in the process.Quote:
I apologize. Most of the time I say stuff like that about you I say it in jest (and I think you recognize that). Right now, I said that deliberately in order to prove a point. Just as you don't like seeing what you believe misrepresented, neither do I.
When I say that I believe ideas A and B, and everyone insists that I actually believe B, C, and D, I'll get testy. I've conceded that there may be people out there who teach what you all have accused me of believing. I can tell you that my church doesn't.
We aren't called to be pragmatic. We're called to be faithful. We aren't "individuals", but members of one body. Upward mobility, while not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, is certainly not a tenet of the Christian faith. That's a "world" thing.Quote:
I personally don't find anything inherent wrong with any of these concepts: pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility. I would say that personal development is a more accurate term than upward mobility, but thats here list, not mine.
Yes I know. That was done deliberately to provoke a reaction from you to prove a point. I expected you to call me out. I have a decent idea of what you believe.Quote:I don't believe AgLiving said anything about what you specifically believe. He made comments about prosperity gospel in general, but I don't see where he said anything that singled your particular beliefs out. You did, however, single mine out and lied in the process.Quote:
I apologize. Most of the time I say stuff like that about you I say it in jest (and I think you recognize that). Right now, I said that deliberately in order to prove a point. Just as you don't like seeing what you believe misrepresented, neither do I.
When I say that I believe ideas A and B, and everyone insists that I actually believe B, C, and D, I'll get testy. I've conceded that there may be people out there who teach what you all have accused me of believing. I can tell you that my church doesn't.
We're not called to be pragmatic? Then why is a whole book of the bible dedicated to proverbs which is essentially dealing in matters of pragmatism?Quote:We aren't called to be pragmatic. We're called to be faithful. We aren't "individuals", but members of one body. Upward mobility, while not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, is certainly not a tenet of the Christian faith. That's a "world" thing.Quote:
Quote:
I personally don't find anything inherent wrong with any of these concepts: pragmatism, individualism, and upward mobility. I would say that personal development is a more accurate term than upward mobility, but thats here list, not mine.
You're in the wrong movement then. Most people in prosperity gospel churches are sick and poor. Especially Africa:Quote:
We are individuals. Your salvation is a matter between you and the Lord, same as a mine. We are members of a body in that we have a role to play within that body. Just as some are called to be evangelists, some missionaries, and some teachers, others are called to support those who are. I believe that we can do a better job supporting them when the body is prosperous and in health, rather than sick and poor. Or at least, I would not want to be join a movement of people who are sick and poor.
So you deliberately lied about me in order to provoke me? And you, as a brother in Christ, are okay with that? This seems to be another example of how this "ends justify the means" mindset has infected the church. You want to prove a point (ends), so you use sinful means to do so. The means must look like Christ, regardless of the ends.Quote:
Yes I know. That was done deliberately to provoke a reaction from you to prove a point. I expected you to call me out. I have a decent idea of what you believe.
Uh, this sounds a lot like the church we see in the NT and early church.Quote:
Or at least, I would not want to be join a movement of people who are sick and poor.
k2aggie07 said:
Proverbs isn't about pragmatism or utility. Proverbs 1 tells you what they're for - wisdom, righteousness, justice, equity, prudence, knowledge, discretion, learning. Proverbs 2 says we should seek wisdom as silver, for knowledge of God. Proverbs 3 touches on the fact that this way of upright living also works well for life - length of days, years of life, peace, favor, good repute, plenty and overflowing vats. But even then it says that the profit of wisdom is better than silver or gold, better than jewels. Very few of the proverbs deal with money -- Proverbs 16:16 says "How much better it is to get wisdom than gold! And to get understanding is to be chosen above silver."
In short, the Proverbs are for virtuous living, not efficacious or pragmatic living. Proverbs 11:4 even says "Riches do not profit in the day of wrath, But righteousness delivers from death." Proverbs 15:9b tell us the Lord "loves one who pursues righteousness."
Yes, being an honorable, hardworking, righteous person usually profits a person better than the alternative. But that's not why we do it. We do it because it is right, because "righteousness delivers from death". If we do it because it works, there's no virtue at all, we are being selfish, we get our reward then in full. Jesus didn't say, if you want success, keep my commandments. He said "if you love Me".
You don't want to join a movement of the sick and poor? Who do you think Christ hung out with all the time???
If it works and it is righteous, why not both?k2aggie07 said:
Proverbs isn't about pragmatism or utility. Proverbs 1 tells you what they're for - wisdom, righteousness, justice, equity, prudence, knowledge, discretion, learning. Proverbs 2 says we should seek wisdom as silver, for knowledge of God. Proverbs 3 touches on the fact that this way of upright living also works well for life - length of days, years of life, peace, favor, good repute, plenty and overflowing vats. But even then it says that the profit of wisdom is better than silver or gold, better than jewels. Very few of the proverbs deal with money -- Proverbs 16:16 says "How much better it is to get wisdom than gold! And to get understanding is to be chosen above silver."
In short, the Proverbs are for virtuous living, not efficacious or pragmatic living. Proverbs 11:4 even says "Riches do not profit in the day of wrath, But righteousness delivers from death." Proverbs 15:9b tell us the Lord "loves one who pursues righteousness."
Yes, being an honorable, hardworking, righteous person usually profits a person better than the alternative. But that's not why we do it. We do it because it is right, because "righteousness delivers from death". If we do it because it works, there's no virtue at all, we are being selfish, we get our reward then in full. Jesus didn't say, if you want success, keep my commandments. He said "if you love Me".
What did Jesus do for those sick people? He patted them on the head and said don't worry about it and then went on his way, right?Quote:
You don't want to join a movement of the sick and poor? Who do you think Christ hung out with all the time???
Because living righteously doesn't necessarily lead to a peaceful and materially prosperous life. It very well may lead to a life of poverty, oppression and/or death. We see that w/ the Apostles. We see that in the early church. There's not a correlation between living righteously and being materially prosperous.Quote:
You would seem to have no issue with someone saying "Read proverbs and you can learn more about how to live righteously". However if I say "applying what is taught in proverbs to your life will lead you to a peaceful and prosperous life" you would get bent out of shape. Why is that?
He healed many, but He didn't make them materially prosperous. What He was truly offering was "life-giving water". Just as we see w/ Paul, sometimes that "thorn" isn't taken away. It isn't an indictment of their faith.Quote:
What did Jesus do for those sick people? He patted them on the head and said don't worry about it and then went on his way, right?
Because you make the mistake of saying prosperous = wealthy. That's not what the proverbs say. If we say prosperous is rich in wisdom, blessings of God, righteousness, yeah, sure.Quote:
If it works and it is righteous, why not both?
You would seem to have no issue with someone saying "Read proverbs and you can learn more about how to live righteously". However if I say "applying what is taught in proverbs to your life will lead you to a peaceful and prosperous life" you would get bent out of shape. Why is that?
Again, I don't get it. The Church prays for the sick, the sorrowing, the captives, all the time. We have prayers for the sick, the priest will come visit you when you are sick. Here in a few days we'll have a service specifically to anoint us for sickness (Holy Unction).Quote:
What did Jesus do for those sick people? He patted them on the head and said don't worry about it and then went on his way, right?
Quote:
How can you call God just when you come across the Scriptural passage on the wage given to the workers? "Friend, I do thee no wrong: I choose to give unto this last even as unto thee. Or is thine eye evil because I am good?" How can a man call God just when he comes across the passage on the prodigal son who wasted his wealth with riotous living, how for the compunction alone which he showed the father ran and fell upon his neck and gave him authority over his wealth? None other but His very Son said these things concerning Him, lest we doubt it, and thus bore witness concerning Him. Where, then, is God's justice?for while we are sinners Christ died for us! But if here He is merciful, we may believe that He will not change.
Solo Tetherball Champ said:
Be sure to remember that the next time you give your child a rock or a snake in lieu of food.