benchmark said:
TCTTS said:
"These things seem to be not happy with each other, at least there is evidence of that."
What evidence?
Whatever data he's been privy to, as one of the leading immunologists/cancer scientists in the world, whom the CIA came to in order to assist them with cases of pilots who came in contact with alleged UAPs and suffered brain damage as a result. Since then, Nolan has emerged as one of the leading voices in the subject of UAPs, lending an air of credibility to the field. As for his credentials, they speak for themselves...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Nolanhttps://med.stanford.edu/profiles/garry-nolanGiven the access/connections he has, whatever evidence he's seen, in the form of data, circumstantial testimony, etc, has led him to this conclusion. I don't know what, exactly, that evidence is, and he's probably not at liberty to divulge half of it. But he's about as credible as they come, and that's why I tend to listen to him. Maybe he's right, maybe he's wrong, it's simply just another theory I found interesting.