Thin to no upper lip? That isn't gay. That is a classic white people trait.
no. She's in amazing shape. That's a good thing.AgOutsideAustin said:
I agree with you on that. Kate could use a couple of #2 Whataburger meals that's all I'm saying.
Come on man, don't hate on Tig, she went to Cy-Creek! Her brother is a riot.BlueAg2003 said:
Gay mouth is a trait I have observed on many lesbians. I have seen so many with the thin upper lip and more prominent teeth. Not every lesbian has gay mouth, but many do. Examples below:
BombayAg said:
And have lots and lots of sex with your hot wife.
Lucky Prince William.
Watch The Crown or the Windsors for a good look at why Prince Charles is who he is.Zemira said:Brian Earl Spilner said:
Am I the only one who thinks Harry is gay?
I don't think so. He might be bi, but doubtful.
I like both of the princes and thankful they take after Diana instead of their father. Both spent considerable time in the military. I think William was in 7 years and Harry 10 years. Harry was in combat in Afghanistan which I think is unreal but he's always been a bit wild and now he's like 6th in line so he can do what he wants. Queen Elizabeth has been teaching William since he was a teenager about duties and taking over the crown so hopefully he should be well prepared. My main question is does his father abdicate or does he try to be king?
Both do a lot a charity work, especially Harry which I would assume come from their mother.
And I learned all this one night when I was bored and spent a few hours going down rabbit holes.
Poised?chiken said:
I've always thought she was so gorgeous. And poised.
BombayAg said:
I am amazed that some of you are so gullible to think that William (or Harry) was REALLY in any sort of combat danger like a Joe Smith would be when sent to Afghanistan or elsewhere.
William is a future King of England. No country would be so dumb to put their future succession line in any risk for a stupid war. This was just a publicity move to make naive and foolish people believe that they are "war heroes". They were just dressed up in combat gear, did a few photo shoots in their get-up, went to some safe Air Base, took some more pictures in dusty conditions and splashed it all over the press.
Everyone goes gaga about their "service" of William and Harry.
The real heroes are the ones who don't have this kind of machinery around them. The Joe Smiths get sent to war, risk their life and limb and in many cases come back in body-bags or incapacitated in some form. I bow to those people and thank them from the bottom my heart, because I don't have the courage and balls to do what these guys selflessly do.
I don't know anything about Prince Harry's service. But I can tell you for certain the Duke of Cambridge put his life in danger every time he took up a Sea King 'cause those things are death traps.BombayAg said:
I am amazed that some of you are so gullible to think that William (or Harry) was REALLY in any sort of combat danger like a Joe Smith would be when sent to Afghanistan or elsewhere.
William is a future King of England. No country would be so dumb to put their future succession line in any risk for a stupid war. This was just a publicity move to make naive and foolish people believe that they are "war heroes". They were just dressed up in combat gear, did a few photo shoots in their get-up, went to some safe Air Base, took some more pictures in dusty conditions and splashed it all over the press.
Everyone goes gaga about their "service" of William and Harry.
The real heroes are the ones who don't have this kind of machinery around them. The Joe Smiths get sent to war, risk their life and limb and in many cases come back in body-bags or incapacitated in some form. I bow to those people and thank them from the bottom my heart, because I don't have the courage and balls to do what these guys selflessly do.
Harry left Bastion a few months before I got there, but he certainly got shot at. He flew Apaches in combat, and even if you don't believe that, Bastion was a relatively frequent target of rocket attacks.BombayAg said:
I am amazed that some of you are so gullible to think that William (or Harry) was REALLY in any sort of combat danger like a Joe Smith would be when sent to Afghanistan or elsewhere.
William is a future King of England. No country would be so dumb to put their future succession line in any risk for a stupid war. This was just a publicity move to make naive and foolish people believe that they are "war heroes". They were just dressed up in combat gear, did a few photo shoots in their get-up, went to some safe Air Base, took some more pictures in dusty conditions and splashed it all over the press.
Everyone goes gaga about their "service" of William and Harry.
The real heroes are the ones who don't have this kind of machinery around them. The Joe Smiths get sent to war, risk their life and limb and in many cases come back in body-bags or incapacitated in some form. I bow to those people and thank them from the bottom my heart, because I don't have the courage and balls to do what these guys selflessly do.
Never took you to be a fan of Lorde.Claude! said:
All I know is that we'll never be royals.
Tanya 93 said:
Bombay is jealous William and Harry's people conquered his.
jickyjack1 said:Tanya 93 said:
Bombay is jealous William and Harry's people conquered his.
For a time, madam, for a time.
"William and Harry's people" couldn't maintain their grasp. Mountbatten's handover as the last Viceroy was England's recognition of the unstemmable current of Time and Events; it climbed off the tiger's back while it still could without being eaten.