Guard
6′2″
/
197 lbs
Dickinson, TX
Dickinson (Wyoming)
Sophomore
3:46
Around Aggieland (2/28)
During Monday's edition of TexAgs Radio, Richard Zane joined to take us Around Aggieland and provided updates from the hardwood, the diamonds and beyond as there is plenty going on with Texas A&M Athletics.
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 76, Ole Miss 66
Buzz Williams and the Aggies earned their second consecutive victory on Saturday, leading the Ole Miss Rebels, wire-to-wire, en route to a 76-66 win. Following the game, Logan Lee shares his biggest takeaways from Texas A&M's performance in the winning effort.
Marcus Williams is taking a 'leave of absence', still enrolled at Texas A&M
In Saturday afternoon's postgame press conference, Buzz Williams addressed Marcus Williams' situation and why he was not with the team in Oxford. Buzz Williams stated that Marcus Williams' leave of absence is indefinite and not punitive.
11:59
Getting the ball to playmakers key in Aggies' rematch with Ole Miss
Texas A&M has a chance to win back-to-back games for the first time since early January on Saturday when they travel to Oxford to take on Ole Miss. Quenton Jackson and Tyrece Radford have led A&M in scoring the past two games, and they could be key for an Aggie win.
Scouting Report: Texas A&M vs. Georgia
Texas A&M defeated Georiga in Athens on Jan. 4 courtesy of a Marcus Williams' buzzer-beater, and on Tuesday night, the Aggies will look for the season sweep of the Dawgs. Ahead of the contest, Logan Lee shares his scouting report on Tom Crean's Bulldogs.
All Updates
2/28/2022
Around Aggieland (2/28)
2/25/2022
Getting the ball to playmakers key in Aggies' rematch with Ole Miss
2/19/2022
Late misses plague Aggies in road loss to Vanderbilt in Nashville, 72-67
1/27/2022
FOX Sports Radio's Aaron Torres takes us Around College Basketball
1/27/2022
Despite late lead, Aggies drop third straight as No. 19 LSU prevails, 70-64
1/23/2022
Despite comeback, Texas A&M falls to Arkansas in overtime, 76-73
1/21/2022
Aggies seek sweep over suddenly surging Razorbacks on Saturday night
1/17/2022
Around Aggieland (1/17)
1/14/2022
Streaking Aggies must refrain from looking past Missouri on Saturday
1/13/2022
Torres: Buzz Williams has Texas A&M trending in the right direction
1/10/2022
Around Aggieland (1/10)
1/7/2022
Around Aggieland (1/7)
1/7/2022
Monaco: Aggies beginning to learn their roles as SEC play heats up
1/4/2022
Thanks to 'Kevin': Marcus Williams' heroic shot beats Georgia, 81-79
12/28/2021
Voice of the Aggies: Talking A&M football, hoops with Andrew Monaco
12/13/2021
Around Aggieland (12/13)
12/3/2021
Around Aggieland (12/3)
11/12/2021
Around Aggieland (11/12)
11/5/2021
Around Aggieland (11/5)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.