Three Things: Thoughts heading into Saturday, Carty commitment & more
Rating: 90
?
National Avg
Rating: 90.7
?
School Preferences
School
Offer
Interest
Texas A&M
Medium
Alabama
Medium
Baylor
Medium
Florida State
Medium
Georgia Tech
Medium
Michigan
Medium
Ohio State
Medium
Penn State
Medium
SMU
Medium
Texas
Medium
Arizona
Low
Arizona State
Low
Auburn
Low
California
Low
Colorado
Low
Florida
Low
Georgia
Low
Grambling
Low
Houston
Low
Kansas
Low
Kansas State
Low
Louisville
Low
LSU
Low
Miami
Low
Missouri
Low
Nebraska
Low
Notre Dame
Low
Ole Miss
Low
Oregon
Low
Oregon State
Low
Pittsburgh
Low
Purdue
Low
San Diego State
Low
South Carolina
Low
South Florida
Low
Stanford
Low
TCU
Low
Tennessee
Low
Texas Tech
Low
UNLV
Low
USC
Low
Utah
Low
West Virginia
Low
Western Kentucky
Low
Wisconsin
Low
+ 35 More
Videos
(7 Total)
3/27/2024
Standout wideout Taz Williams took in Texas A&M's Tuesday practice
3/26/2024
In-Home Visit: Prospects return to Aggieland as spring practice begins
3/24/2024
Aggie commit Deondrae Riden is helping A&M in its recruiting efforts
9/8/2023
Highlights: Red Oak rallies to beat Lake Belton in an overtime thriller
5/16/2023
Texas A&M was the first to offer 2025 Red Oak WR Taz Williams
12/30/1969
2021 Season Highlights
12/30/1969
Taz Williams Jr- SOPH Szn Highlights
Show more
Photos
(20 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×