default image
Status:
Committed

Dwayne Haskins

Quarterback
6′2″ / 185 lbs
Potomac, MD
The Bullis School
Class of 2016
Rating: 95
?

National Avg
Rating: 95.5
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Ohio State
Committed
1/18/2016
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Auburn
None
Florida
None
Florida State
None
Maryland
None
Miami
None
Michigan
None
Notre Dame
None
Oklahoma
None
Penn State
None
Texas
None
+ 8 More

Updates

Ryan Brauninger
8 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger
Nick Starkel playing today
Nick Starkel is playing in the International Bowl today at 3 on ESPN3 for those of you looking to get an early look at the only QB in the 2016 A&M class.The other two QBs on the roster are Dwayne Haskins and Tristen Wallace. There's also quite a few Texas kids playing. With no other football on today, it may be worthwhile for you football junkies that need your fix.
Maryland QB Dwayne Haskins still in contact with Texas A&M
8 yr ago by Ryan Brauninger
Maryland QB Dwayne Haskins still in contact with Texas A&M
The change in coaching staffs at Maryland has highly rated 2016 Bullis School (Potomac, Md.) quarterback Dwayne Haskins examining all his options. Among them is Texas A&M, which has a situation at the position as intriguing as any.
Reactions from the recruits: South Carolina edition
9 yr ago by Brice Jones
Reactions from the recruits: South Carolina edition
The Aggies shocked about everyone by setting foot in Columbia and not just upsetting the Gamecocks on the road, but easily overpowering them. Several of A&M's top targets' eyes may have been opened most.
Elite 2016 QB finds reciprocal interest in Aggieland
9 yr ago by Brice Jones
Elite 2016 QB finds reciprocal interest in Aggieland
Dwayne Haskins reached out to the Texas A&M staff last week, and it didn't take long for a response. Now in contact with Jake Spavital, the 2016 Potomac (Md.) star has his sights set on a potential visit to C-Stat.

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2015

All-State First Team (Capital Gazette)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.