default image
Status:
Committed

Mark Andrews

Tight End
6′6″ / 225 lbs
Scottsdale, AZ
Desert Mountain
Class of 2014
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Oklahoma
Committed
1/1/1900
 
Texas A&M
None

Updates

Recruiting Review: Focus turns to O-line needs
10 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Review: Focus turns to O-line needs
Eschewing bye week rest, the Aggie coaching staff is hitting the road with high-priority targets in their sights. From a crop of JUCO and elite high school talent, who is A&M eying to fill an increasingly big need?
Recruiting Review: Elite targets turn A&M's way
10 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Review: Elite targets turn A&M's way
Could Sunday's camp have gone any better for the Aggie staff? Despite the lack of commitments, the buzz following the day's events begs the question. Liucci notes which blue-chips are favoring A&M going forward.
Andrews recaps A&M visit
10 yr ago by Brice Jones
Andrews recaps A&M visit
The 2014 Desert Mountain tight end/receiver visited Texas A&M for the first time last weekend, taking in all that teammate Kyle Allen had described to him. He touched on his impressions and much more with TexAgs.
Recruiting Review: Summer circuit set to kick into gear
10 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting Review: Summer circuit set to kick into gear
Camps and subsequent offers are on the horizon, signaling the beginning of summer. Liucci notes who's in line for an Aggie offer, which prospects the staff is homing in on and what A&M's top targets are planning.
Ten on a Tuesday: Top out-of-state targets
10 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Ten on a Tuesday: Top out-of-state targets
Remaining spots in Texas A&M's 2014 class are taking on increasing relevance with the Aggies' increasing profile. From Louisiana to the west coast, which non-Texan prospects will play prominent roles in the race?
All Updates
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.