default image
Status:
Committed

Jeremiah Tshimanga

Linebacker
6′3″ / 230 lbs
Fort Worth, TX
Richland
Class of 2012
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: n/a
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Oklahoma State
Committed
1/1/1900
 
Texas A&M
None
Oklahoma
None
 
Texas
None
 

Updates

Recruiting update: A&M setting to work on '12 trail
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Recruiting update: A&M setting to work on '12 trail
As Kevin Sumlin begins to solidify his coaching staff and the recruiting race makes its final turn toward the checkered flag in 2012, the Aggies are looking to finish off their highly-rated clsss. Billy Liucci explores.
The next step to Linebacker U???
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
The next step to Linebacker U???
The 2012 class is loaded with an extremely good crop of linebackers and A&M has found themselves in good position with almost all of them. Here is an update with Derek David, Peter Jinkens and Jeremiah Tshimanga.
Aggie Recruiting: A Christmas Wish List for 2012
13 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Aggie Recruiting: A Christmas Wish List for 2012
Billy Liucci breaks down Texas A&M's "wish list" for the class of 2012, taking a position-by-position look. Find out who the coaching staff's key targets and top-level prospects are for the current junior class.
Reactions from the Recruits: Nebraska Edition
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Reactions from the Recruits: Nebraska Edition
It was the best game that I have witnessed at Kyle Field and from the sounds of things, that goes for all of the recruits that were at the game too. Here is what some of the recruits had to say.
Recruiting Update: Richland LB Jeremiah Tshimanga
13 yr ago by Logan Lee
Recruiting Update: Richland LB Jeremiah Tshimanga
Logan Lee checks in on Richland linebacker Jeremiah Tshimanga, who is starting to watch his recruitment skyrocket in recent weeks. Are the Ags in the top spot at this point? Logan has the answer and more.
All Updates

Photos

(4 Total)

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2010

6-5A Second Team All-District

2011

Second Team Super Team (Star-Telegram)
6-5A First Team All-District
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.