default image
Status:
Signed

Kimo Tipoti

Offensive Lineman
6′5″ / 320 lbs
Dallas, TX
Hurst L.D. Bell
Class of 2012
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 88.7
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Oklahoma
None
 
Texas
None
 

Videos

(5 Total)
Overtime with Trey Williams
Scouting the 2012 Commits: OL Kimo Tipoti
High School Highlights: Euless Trinity vs L.D. Bell
Tipoti talks A&M football
2012 Recruit Highlights: Hurst L.D. Bell OL Kimo Tipoti

Updates

Overtime with Trey Williams
4:48
11 yr ago by Logan Lee
Overtime with Trey Williams
TexAgs.com made an impromptu decision to stop at Dekaney high school to chat with Anthony Williams, the Wildcats' running backs coach, and Aggie signee, Trey Williams, about his future at Texas A&M.
What's next for Trey Williams?
12 yr ago by Logan Lee
What's next for Trey Williams?
TexAgs takes a look at what the signing class of 2012 is doing to prepare themselves for their future in College Station. Trey Williams has his mind set on winning, among other things, during his freshman year.
What's next for Michael Richardson?
12 yr ago by Logan Lee
What's next for Michael Richardson?
TexAgs takes a look at what the signing class of 2012 is doing to prepare themselves for their first year in college. DeSoto's defensive end/linebacker, Michael Richardson, talked about his future at Texas A&M.
19 for 19: Big-picture musings on A&M's 2012 class
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
19 for 19: Big-picture musings on A&M's 2012 class
How should Signing Day be remembered? What does the Ags' future hold? In closing the book on the 2012 recruiting season, Liucci discusses 19 thoughts on A&M's haul — one for each of Kevin Sumlin's signees.
Signing Day 2012: Did A&M make the grade?
12 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Signing Day 2012: Did A&M make the grade?
The latest edition of the constant recruiting saga came and went as it always does, with last-minute losses and gains in a flurry of excitement. The question is: Where were the Aggies left when the dust settled?
All Updates

Photos

(4 Total)

Career Stats

Season

Honors

2010

Second Team Super Team (Star-Telegram)

2011

First Team Super Team (Star-Telegram)
6-5A Second Team All-District
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.