quote:
Contrary to popular belief, A&M was headed to the SEC in 2011 no matter what - and conveniently blamed the Longhorn Network.
quote:
So in 2011 he had sources that gave him definitive information saying A&M was not going to the SEC in 2012. Now in 2016 he has sources that give him definitive information about the reasons why in 2011 A&M was absolutely resigned to leave for the SEC?
quote:quote:
So in 2011 he had sources that gave him definitive information saying A&M was not going to the SEC in 2012. Now in 2016 he has sources that give him definitive information about the reasons why in 2011 A&M was absolutely resigned to leave for the SEC?
He must be a Democrat.
quote:quote:
So in 2011 he had sources that gave him definitive information saying A&M was not going to the SEC in 2012. Now in 2016 he has sources that give him definitive information about the reasons why in 2011 A&M was absolutely resigned to leave for the SEC?
He must be a Democrat.
quote:quote:quote:
So in 2011 he had sources that gave him definitive information saying A&M was not going to the SEC in 2012. Now in 2016 he has sources that give him definitive information about the reasons why in 2011 A&M was absolutely resigned to leave for the SEC?
He must be a Democrat.
No, he must be one of those know-it-all t-shirt fans. There are plenty of those posting in this forum.
quote:Yes, we were going to the SEC. And the key word here is "conveniently". The LHN gave us the political excuse to leave. Well, the documented lies that were told about the LHN, that is.
If you don't read the article, read this quote:quote:
Contrary to popular belief, A&M was headed to the SEC in 2011 no matter what - and conveniently blamed the Longhorn Network.
quote:
The author Chip Brown does not have an official agenda, so he really doesn't know what topic is going to get serious debate/consideration. At this point its all speculation.
I will say that Chip Brown has a descent resume and he can probably be trusted to bring quality information to the table.