quote:
It might have been easier for A&M to achieve kingpin status staying in the Big 12.
That would be true if you thought the only thing A&M needed was to win a few more games.
The truth is... teams in the BDF do not have the parity that teams have in the SEC. Even if A&M were to have been boosted by Sumlin winning... the end result would still have been a downturn. The SEC is 6-3 against the BDF the past 2 seasons.
A&M would never fill a 106K seat stadium with a home schedule of:
(2011)
SMU
Idaho
Okie State
Baylol
Missouri West Va
Kansas
tu
or (2010)
SFA
La Tech
FIU
Missouri
Tech
OU
Nebraska TCU
Look at 2010... what a crap schedule.
Add to that... the BDF has done away with the Conference Championship game (Big Revenue shared among all).
Add to that the way Conference revenue was being shared.
THE biggest problem with the BDF boils all problems down to financial support among the teams.
Kansas, West Va, TCU, K-State, Iowa State will NEVER have the natural financial ability to compete with tu and OU, and with the lack of parity in revenue sharing, along with the LHN... there is just no real way those teams will be able to maintain facilities and coaching staffs to be consistently competitive in the BDF... nor will they be able to recruit the best athletes to beat the better teams in the nation.
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/nacda/sports/directorscup/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/june26confstand.pdf
BDF: 6 (tu), 19 (OU), 22 (OSU), 31 (Baylol), 38 (ISU), 55 (KU), 59 (Tech), 69 (WV), 77 (TCU), 99 (KSU)
SEC: 2 (Fl), 10 (A&M), 11 (Kent), 16 (Ga), 17 (Bama), 24 (L$U), 28 (Ark), 34 (Aub), 35 (USCe), 40 (TU), 45 (Vandy), 46 (Missouri), 52 (MissSt), 54 (Ole Miss).
Look at that. 10 teams vs 14 teams, and BDF has 5 teams who finished 2014 lower than all 14 SEC teams.
SEC has 5 teams (36%) in the Top 20, BDF has 2 (20%).
And that gap will grow even more this year.
Arguing for a future for the BDF is like arguing the CUSA greatness when SMU was headed there from the SWC.