quote:He has lost it
The answer is due tomorrow (unless they file for another extension).
Call me a nut, call me overzealous or whatever you wish. The fact is that Sharon Israel, the attorney representing the Colts, is aware the attorney for TAMU filed a fraudulent complaint. There is no way around that fact.
Sit on whatever side of this argument you want. Just grab your popcorn, because its happening.
At this point, it is not about what is contained in the defendant's answer to the complaint. It is about how Sharon Israel fulfills her ethical obligations, what the atty for the school does and how Sim Lake handles the matter.
I am calling Texas A&M University out for perpetuating a criminally fraudulent scheme. If the complaint in the federal litigation against the Colts is not withdrawn tomorrow, I am going to the Texas Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney General. I am very comfortable the fourth estate is aware of this and will deal with the facts accordingly.
The attorneys involved in the litigation have had three months to do the right thing. It is time that people are held accountable.
quote:Ya think?quote:He has lost it
The answer is due tomorrow (unless they file for another extension).
Call me a nut, call me overzealous or whatever you wish. The fact is that Sharon Israel, the attorney representing the Colts, is aware the attorney for TAMU filed a fraudulent complaint. There is no way around that fact.
Sit on whatever side of this argument you want. Just grab your popcorn, because its happening.
At this point, it is not about what is contained in the defendant's answer to the complaint. It is about how Sharon Israel fulfills her ethical obligations, what the atty for the school does and how Sim Lake handles the matter.
I am calling Texas A&M University out for perpetuating a criminally fraudulent scheme. If the complaint in the federal litigation against the Colts is not withdrawn tomorrow, I am going to the Texas Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney General. I am very comfortable the fourth estate is aware of this and will deal with the facts accordingly.
The attorneys involved in the litigation have had three months to do the right thing. It is time that people are held accountable.

quote:
Call me a nut
quote:
I've always figured that his wife left him for an Aggie.
quote:quote:
I've always figured that his wife left him for an Aggie.
That's exactly what happened.
quote:
Randolph Duke
quote:He is going to implode with the ruling!
The crazy Texas fan angle would be a much smaller story than writing about TAMU's fraudulent trademark and their insanely stupid decision to try to perpetrate a fraud upon the federal court to defend it. The fact that an **** alumnus is the judge hearing the case makes the story even better.
The writer is a professional. He understands what angle will have the most interest. besides, at the end of the day, the fact remains that I am right.
The **** 12th Man "tradition" started in 1921 (if not sooner), and for decades thereafter only consisted of calling their fans the team's 12th Man. Hundreds of other schools had the exact same tradition. It wasn't until at least 1939 that the E. King Gill angle began to be included in the school's tradition. It wasn't until 1962 that the school first mentioned Gill in connection with the school's 12th Man "tradition" in any of their yearbooks.
Texas A&M fraudulently mislead the USPTO when they filed their trademark application claiming the school's tradition started in 1922 and was from that day connected with E. King Gill. There are attempting to perpetuate a fraud upon the federal court by again fraudulently asserting their tradition started in 1922 to commemorate E. King Gill.
Whatever anyone thinks of me, my research is solid. The bigger story here is the university's fraud, not that college football in the state of Texas has passionate fans. No one in Buffalo, Seattle or Indianapolis is going to care in the least about a story discussing a football fan who does historical research. However, when the pro football fans in those cities learn the bullying Texas A&M was doing over the trademark was part of a long running fraud, they are going to want to read that article.

quote:Didn't they also trademark "dewsh U". Seems to be missing from their list.
Can someone explain to me how they can register "TEXAS". And BEVO - didn't we technically use that term first?
quote:How is it possible to trademark a color?
Can someone explain to me how they can register "TEXAS". And BEVO - didn't we technically use that term first?