quote:
Do you honestly think Hill would have put up 35 on Auburn? Or that he would have been MVP of the bowl game?
Regardless, the team lost faith in Hill and he was desynchronized with the receivers. That and Allan is younger so he has more upside.
You do realize that players and especially QBs are allowed to get better in college football right?
Sure. Auburn's defense was mediocre at best and its secondary particularly suspect. A lot like us. Hill put up quite a few points against South Carolina, which in the end proved to be a team on par with Auburn.
I'm even ready to defend Hill's performance in some of the losses. I believe the record debits Aggie receivers with 11 official dropped passes against Mississippi State and there were several more that could have been caught. One of the interceptions bounced off the leg of the receiver after he was on the ground and back up to a defender. It could just have easily been incomplete, or even caught.
I believe a close look at replays of the Ole Miss game will show that the receiver made the wrong read on one pick six and broke away from where the ball should have been, and was, thrown. And I think the receiver slipped down on another interception. Not a bad pass, just bad luck.
Even at Alabama, the entire offense was poor (three receivers blocked the same man on a screen, receivers and backs regularly blew other blocks, made bad reads and ran poor routes, offensive linemen had no clue whom to block, etc.), not just Hill.
I'm not in position to know if the team lost faith in Hill, but it's clear the coaches did and that's even more important. So he's gone. I do realize that QBs are allowed to get better (even Hill?) and I certainly expect Allen to be better. I was primarily concerned last year with his arm strength (especially on throws from the right hash to left sideline), a big windup resulting in a slow delivery, and faulty footwork. Hopefully, all will be improved.