quote:

---

wat

---

you don't know that then don't dare try to tell us about playing sip again

quote:

---

quote:

---

wat

---

you don't know that then don't dare try to tell us about playing sip again

---

You're incredibly naive if you don't think some of our SEC conference companions wouldn't try sketchy contracts with us or haven't had them in the past.

Rivalry week is my favorite week of college football each year...even more than the post season. It sucks we aren't truly part of it any more. LSU is a great series, but it will never compare to t.u. as a rivalry.

...AND THAT'S WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO TO THEM, AGS!!! WHOOP!!!







(i guess)

quote:

---

man, some of y'all drink early during the week.

---

Is there something wrong with that?

was this post delayed by 3 years or something?

quote:

---

---

Kinda disturbing actually......but still funny.

quote:

---

quote:

---

---

Maybe it's hard to see all the angles when you are In the tank for whorn. If you enjoy the thrill of losing your money in a rigged casino, but all means, keep playing.

---

spot on!!

there are a bunch of those that don't remember or never wanted to recognize what sip did to us

let them wander the wilderness for a few more years....and then play on our terms

How good the horns last class is won't be known until we see how many of the grade risks actually make it to campus this fall.

That class has Frantastic written all over it.

I don't know enough about their class to know the grade risks for all of their recruits, so I'll give you that while also pointing out that they also whiffed at a serious need position in QB.

However, what I do know about their class is they were able to beat us out for a few and several big programs out for recruits that a lot of schools wanted. As long as that's going on, we're kidding ourselves with the "wandering alone in the wilderness" talk.

your schtick is old.

quote:

---

You're incredibly naive if you don't think some of our SEC conference companions wouldn't try sketchy contracts with us or haven't had them in the past.

Rivalry week is my favorite week of college football each year...even more than the post season. It sucks we aren't truly part of it any more. LSU is a great series, but it will never compare to t.u. as a rivalry.

---

100 yrs is a long time...

quote:

---

Why did they do everything in their power to maintain an unfair advantage from every angle. To keep the deck stacked in their favor. It has absolutely nothing to do with A&M losing to them. It has everything to do with the way that the losses were administered. Through unfair scholorship's, to the media, refs and.......

---

You don't think Alabama/LSU would do everything in there power to maintain an unfair advantage? You don't think we've done similar things to maintain an unfair advantage over the years? I would expect nothing less if you're trying to win at a high level in college athletics or in business in general. You're incredibly naive.

As for the rest of your asinine diatribe about how bad they are and regurgitating the tired narrative that they are in a terrible place now with our foot on their throat...it's bull****. I know it sounds great. I wish they were in as bad of a place as you believe, but they aren't.

They still make a crazy amount of money each year as a program, and Ohio State has shown the blue print for how you can win at a high level as a program with resources in an inferior conference. 5 years from now the way we keep them down is by beating them each November after they have a puffed up ranking due to their easy Big XII schedule and the media giving them credit they don't deserve. It's not by not playing them.

quote:

---

quote:

---

You're incredibly naive if you don't think some of our SEC conference companions wouldn't try sketchy contracts with us or haven't had them in the past.

Rivalry week is my favorite week of college football each year...even more than the post season. It sucks we aren't truly part of it any more. LSU is a great series, but it will never compare to t.u. as a rivalry.

---

100 yrs is a long time...

---

I'm sure the LSU series will become better and better over time, but we simply don't live along side them to the degree that we do with t.u.

The week of the LSU series I text with a handful of LSU friends I met in the Oil and Gas industry.

It seems like half of my high school ended up at either t.u. or a&m, and now I work along side way more sips than LSU folks. There's just a buzz in the state during that week for t.u. that LSU will never quite reach.

Regardless, why not have two great games on our schedule rather than just one.

quote:

---

I don't know enough about their class to know the grade risks for all of their recruits, so I'll give you that while also pointing out that they also whiffed at a serious need position in QB.

However, what I do know about their class is they were able to beat us out for a few and several big programs out for recruits that a lot of schools wanted. As long as that's going on, we're kidding ourselves with the "wandering alone in the wilderness" talk.

---

They haven't beat us for many recruits at all. It was 15-2 last year and 16-6 in Feb. The only reason they got Malik is that he was a December enrollee, we were without a DC, and he had a load of family oressure.

The SEC is filled with great games. Not just one.

quote:

---

They haven't beat us for many recruits at all. It was 15-2 last year and 16-6 in Feb. The only reason they got Malik is that he was a December enrollee, we were without a DC, and he had a load of family oressure.

---

Where did I say "many"...

I said a few, and they beat us out for Jefferson, Hill, and Boyd...all solid recruits at need positions we wanted.

Then they landed several other recruits that while not on our radar, still solid recruits that were sought by other big programs. My main point being that while not contending for national titles as they were 5 years ago, they're not on their deathbed the way people on here want to believe.

And schools like Florida and South Carolina figure "hell, let's add one more great game to our schedule"...so should we

quote:

---

Some of you are so battered by the rough years when they dominated us.

---

Facepalm. Not this shate again. Sip quit dominating us as soon as schollies began being limited, we grew from being an all male service academy into a national university...so on and so on and so on.

So many reasons to hat em...being dominated by em ain't one of them. Rebutting this myth has become tedious.

Sid, they were the head and shoulders dominant program during the decade before our SEC move. That's all I was talking about.

...As for hating them, hate only makes a rivalry better. Before you go into "but they screwed us", our leadership won't let them happen if we begin the series again with them. If our leadership does allow them to screw us, we have much bigger problems in 2015.

Since we're discussing current events, remember that Fran guy?

quote:

---

quote:

---

Maybe it's hard to see all the angles when you are In the tank for whorn. If you enjoy the thrill of losing your money in a rigged casino, but all means, keep playing.

---

I don't think it's a rigged casion over the long term. Some of you are so battered by the rough years when they dominated us.I think now that we're in the SEC and under different leadership we can beat them consistently.

quote:

---

there are a bunch of those that don't remember or never wanted to recognize what sip did to us let them wander the wilderness for a few more years....and then play on our terms

---

By "did to us" are you talking about contracts that favored them or beating us on the field.

1) It should go without saying that we will accept no contract that isn't equally beneficial for both schools in terms of a series. If our leadership isn't competent enough to not get screwed by them when given that as the only acceptable criteria, we have bigger problems as an institution.

2) If it's because you're upset they beat us so consistently over the years, I'd say that was then, this is now. I think we will beat them consistently, and not playing someone because you're afraid of losing is downright pathetic.

quote:

---

let them wander the wilderness for a few more years....and then play on our terms

---

This is more naive thinking.

They won't "wander the wilderness" the way people on here want to pretend. They have a ridiculous amount of resources and can easily be successful enough in the weaker Big XII to be a huge headache for us in recruiting.

They pulled in a good class this year (particularly compared to other Big XII schools) while giving us a big scare for Mack/Murray and landing Jefferson at a need position for us. They may not be contending for national titles, but they aren't wandering the wilderness either.

---

It IS a rigged casino . . . for as long as whorn is better at media manipulation and political positioning. It's the necessary outcome of a big law and journalism school. Look @ that damn LWN deal. Tell me that was fair to the other Big-12 teams. And all that yellow laundry that helps whorn win . . . versus Ok State, Kansas, Iowa State, and yes, Texas A&M. You aren't even trying to deny that the casino is rigged. All you are arguing is that it wont be rigged forever.

Whorn effed us in terms of contracting (A&M pulled its pants down here. The school is just awful @ contract negotiating, see the damn Seattle Seahawk 12th Man license for detail). And yes, whorn effed us on the field (yellow laundry). And yes, whorn effed us in the ESiPN booth. There was some nasty hatchet-work around the time of the SECede movement. Recall David Bin rUbben (it out)'s fine work? How about the lack of respect A&M got from all the whorns? "Little Brother"; "They are your problem now"; "blowU is our rival".

I'm not afraid of losing to those pathetic, needy, manipulative, greedy money-whorns. STOP SPINNING. These are rational arguments, there is no need for A&M to ever play whorn regularly. It simply isn't in A&M best interest. We got 'em by the balls in recruiting with our SEC position compared to their 'JV football is still really exciting' league. If A&M ever decided to play whorn regularly, whorn would use their spin to vastly reduce this recruiting advantage. ITS NOT ABOUT WHORN ANYMORE. It's about what's best for A&M as we go for a natty.

Oh, and whorn's latest class was pure Frantasy. I mean it was Frantastic. Good LB, good corners, no Oline or Dline. Aggies know how great a strategy that is. . .

ckwarren you offered up nothing but a wall of text filed with regurgitated bull sh#% I've already torn down if you read my other posts on this thread.

I'm done with with this thread. Thankfully there are smarter people at our institution than those on this thread like you, and the series will be back on in under 5 years.

quote:

---

.As for hating them, hate only makes a rivalry better. Before you go into "but they screwed us", our leadership won't let them happen if we begin the series again with them. If our leadership does allow them to screw us, we have much bigger problems in 2015.

---

Sigh... it's like speaking to someone that's 3 years old telling them not to play in dog ****. What they have done to us in the past didnt have any thing to do with OUR administration then or now. It has to do with the tactics they use to do what they do. For some strange reason that little fact just keeps being magically forgotten and that they are all ready to play fair and be loved by everyone. My biggest question is, why are you taking up for them in any way, shape or fashion. What is wrong with you. They are spinning the drain with the clown show that has been going on the last 3 years. They get a few decent players and you think they are all world. We said the same thing when the Fraud was here. Thought we were going places and then the games were played

. If you knew anything about the game you should be embarrassed for even thinking that they have all the pieces to the puzzle. The problem is not letting them up for air in any way. Recruiting is only gonna get worse for them if we do well in the next 2 years. Of which I fully expect us to be way better on defense than what we have. That is their biggest problem going forward. They hope and pray we dont even sniff a West title. If we do, we are in the NC game. Or at least in the playoffs.

Please stop with the apologetics , and tell me why you are taking up for them like you do. Are you a closet sip?

quote:

---

ckwarren you offered up nothing but a wall of text filed with regurgitated bull sh#% I've already torn down if you read my other posts on this thread.

---

Maybe he did maybe he didnt. Was pretty solid to me. But, you nor anyone else on here has given a valid reason for playing them. Not one. The reason being is that you cant. Even if you think you did in the previous post, you didnt. Are you a sip?

I got ya OP