Did anyone else notice that the CoCS is in the design process for a traffic light at Victoria & Fitch?
Aside from folks that are 'fer' and 'agin,' I am curious about the highway design itself. On Hwy 2818 between Texas Avenue and FM 2154 (Wellborn Rd) there are several signals (four, I believe, and that doesn't include the intersections mentioned above). In addition, there are small access roads parallel to the highway so if I, for example, wish to visit the post office, I must turn at Southwood and then proceed down the access road. This enables me to travel at a reasonable speed along the highway and turn at the signal. There are few entrance/exits along 2818 itself (yes, exceptions like Consol and the gas station/library exist) so that traffic can somewhat proceed unimpeded if the signals are timed well. If someone turns right on a red signal onto 2818 they are required to stop first and then proceed. So, why is so much of Victoria and Fitch being developed with access directly to the highway? The Victoria/Fitch intersection I understand--that is a through street. I am referring to the commercial businesses further east, and the subdivisions further west. Traffic has only just begun to reach higher levels in the last few years, but with the developments springing up right and left, it seems unsafe.
I am no traffic engineer, no TTI expert, but is it a cost issue? Government has to buy the land at FMV and so cannot afford to have the extra between the highway and access road? Castlegate was built prior to Fitch, so that is a non-issue, but having to travel an extra 100 yards to turn at an intersection has never deterred me from visiting a location.
Any opinions/info out there?
Aside from folks that are 'fer' and 'agin,' I am curious about the highway design itself. On Hwy 2818 between Texas Avenue and FM 2154 (Wellborn Rd) there are several signals (four, I believe, and that doesn't include the intersections mentioned above). In addition, there are small access roads parallel to the highway so if I, for example, wish to visit the post office, I must turn at Southwood and then proceed down the access road. This enables me to travel at a reasonable speed along the highway and turn at the signal. There are few entrance/exits along 2818 itself (yes, exceptions like Consol and the gas station/library exist) so that traffic can somewhat proceed unimpeded if the signals are timed well. If someone turns right on a red signal onto 2818 they are required to stop first and then proceed. So, why is so much of Victoria and Fitch being developed with access directly to the highway? The Victoria/Fitch intersection I understand--that is a through street. I am referring to the commercial businesses further east, and the subdivisions further west. Traffic has only just begun to reach higher levels in the last few years, but with the developments springing up right and left, it seems unsafe.
I am no traffic engineer, no TTI expert, but is it a cost issue? Government has to buy the land at FMV and so cannot afford to have the extra between the highway and access road? Castlegate was built prior to Fitch, so that is a non-issue, but having to travel an extra 100 yards to turn at an intersection has never deterred me from visiting a location.
Any opinions/info out there?