Exaltation of the Holy Cross

1,626 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by wbt5845
Guadaloop474
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From my pastor's blog this holy day...

EXALTATION OF THE HOLY CROSS

After the crucifixion of our Lord on the hill of Calvary, and after his subsequent resurrection from the nearby tomb where His body had been placed, there was a concerted effort by both the Jewish and Roman authorities in Jerusalem to obliterate any physical evidence or reminder of these events. They didn't want there to be any rallying-place for the disciples of Jesus to gather, so dirt was piled up over the general site, and with the passage of time there were pagan temples built on top of it. But a persistent story was passed from generation to generation; namely, that the Cross on which Christ had died had been hidden somewhere underneath the site which was subsequently covered by pagan places of worship.

Saint Helena, the mother of the Emperor Constantine, was nearing the end of her life. A devout Christian, she received the divine inspiration that she should journey to Jerusalem to excavate the area where the Holy Sepulchre was, and attempt to locate the True Cross. The year was 326, and she set off on her pilgrimage. When St. Helena arrived in Jerusalem she was able to find someone who was very familiar with the story of where the Holy Cross had been hidden, and she ordered the excavation to begin obviously able to arrange such a project because she was the Emperor's mother.

The excavation was a success, but the problem was that three crosses were found on the spot. How was St. Helena to determine which one was the True Cross of Jesus? What happened next has come to us down through history in a tradition which tells us that St. Helena, along with the Bishop of Jerusalem, devised an experiment. The three crosses were taken to a woman who was near death; when she touched the True Cross, she was healed. This confirmed to St. Helena that the actual Cross upon which our Lord was crucified had been found.

Such a discovery called for celebration, and along with the great rejoicing and prayers of thanksgiving to God, the Emperor Constantine ordered that two churches be built one at the site of the burial of Christ (the Holy Sepulchre) and one on the site of the crucifixion (Mount Calvary). Because the sites were very close to one another, the churches were actually connected by a great colonnade, and today they are fully incorporated as one structure. The solemn dedication of the churches took place on September 13 and 14, in the year 335. The Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross was fixed on September 14th, spreading from Jerusalem, on to other churches, until by the year 720 the celebration was kept throughout the whole Church.

The story doesn't end there. In the early seventh century, the Persians conquered Jerusalem. The Persian king looted the city and stole the True Cross, taking it to Persia. Eventually, however, the Emperor recaptured the True Cross and brought it back to Jerusalem. The tradition says that he carried the Cross on his own back, but when he attempted to enter the church on Mount Calvary, he was unable to take another step. Bishop Zacharias of Jerusalem saw that the emperor was having difficulty, and so advised him to take off his royal robes and crown, and to dress in a penitential robe instead. As soon as the Emperor took the bishop's advice, he was able to carry the True Cross into the church, where it was enshrined for the veneration of the Faithful. Eventually, smaller pieces of the relic were distributed throughout Christendom.
diehard03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
The excavation was a success, but the problem was that three crosses were found on the spot. How was St. Helena to determine which one was the True Cross of Jesus? What happened next has come to us down through history in a tradition which tells us that St. Helena, along with the Bishop of Jerusalem, devised an experiment. The three crosses were taken to a woman who was near death; when she touched the True Cross, she was healed. This confirmed to St. Helena that the actual Cross upon which our Lord was crucified had been found.

Seems like an odd connection, and considering how widespread the imagery that the 3 crosses together is, shouldn't all 3 be considered important?
Solo Tetherball Champ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think so.

Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So where is the cross today?
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where was the cross buried? At Calvary or the sepulcher?
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
So where is the cross today?


No telling. Muslim and Jewish and other merchants sold "pieces of Jesus cross" and other things to Christian crusaders and noblemen.

Impossible to know where or if it still exists in any fashion.
Guadaloop474
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
As soon as the Emperor took the bishop's advice, he was able to carry the True Cross into the church, where it was enshrined for the veneration of the Faithful. Eventually, smaller pieces of the relic were distributed throughout Christendom.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
So where is the cross today?


Reused and/or probably burned a couple weeks after the crucifixion.
Pro Sandy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So where can I see it today?
BurnetAggie99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tunic of Jesus is at Cathedral of Trier in Germany.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If all the pieces of the "True Cross" were assembled at one place, you'd have enough wood for the Ark, not the Cross.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
So where can I see it today?
Dispersal of relics of the True Cross - Wiki

One such fragment is not far from where I live, Shrine of the True Cross, Dickinson, Texas

quote:
If all the pieces of the "True Cross" were assembled at one place, you'd have enough wood for the Ark, not the Cross.
From the Wiki link above -
quote:
Conflicting with this is the finding of Charles Rohault de Fleury, who, in his Mmoire sur les instruments de la Passion of 1870 made a study of the relics in reference to the criticisms of Calvin and Erasmus. He drew up a catalogue of all known relics of the True Cross showing that, in spite of what various authors have claimed, the fragments of the Cross brought together again would not reach one-third that of a cross which has been supposed to have been three or four metres (9.8 or 13.1 feet) in height, with transverse branch of two metres (6.6 feet) wide, proportions not at all abnormal. He calculated: supposing the Cross to have been of pine-wood (based on his microscopic analysis of the fragments) and giving it a weight of about seventy-five kilogrammes, we find the original volume of the cross to be 0.178 cubic metres (6.286 cubic feet). The total known volume of known relics of the True Cross, according to his catalogue, amounts to approximately 0.004 cubic metres (0.141 cubic feet) (more specifically 3,942,000 cubic millimetres), leaving a volume of 0.174 m3 (6.145 cu ft) lost, destroyed, or otherwise unaccounted for.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pine?
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was not making the claim that all (or that any) of the relics are authentic. I was simply showing the claim that there are so many fragments that their volume would vastly exceed that of the one used for the crucifixion.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, but there's about a metric ton of cross relics for sale pretty much every day in Jerusalem.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.