quote:
That's not the point I'm making. I'm not saying there isn't a god to guide you here. I'm saying that even in an extreme pro-evolution stance, there can still be a creator.
After I left the Catholic church is '99, I had a brief affair with this type of deism. I believed in a supernatural Creator, but rejected the God and gods described in religion for a number of reasons. I believed that evolution best explained diversification of life. This affair was short because I think the very nature of our understanding raises some difficult questions - and the key, I think, is in the very word 'unguided' that you struck out.
Lets say that someone believes in evolution. Was this evolution guided by God or was it not guided? If it was guided by God, then the process is not entirely natural. It stands to reason that if God meant for human beings to exist by manipulating evolutionary processes, then we have some purpose, some meaning beyond what meaning we give to our own lives. It is also logical (maybe) that an intervening God would reveal itself to us to explain what purpose there is to our lives. It seems to me that it is difficult to believe in a guided form of evolution and not believe in a personal God - the type that we see in religions.
However, if our evolution is not guided and the creation of life on Earth was not sparked intentionally by the divine, where does this leave humans? If we are a product of chance, then do we have any cosmic or supernatural significance? Even if God exists, it is no more necessary that God cares about our species than it is necessary that God cares about the rocks and gas clouds floating in space. If God had no hand in intentionally creating our species, what is the likelihood that God would reveal himself to us? Do you feel inclined to reveal yourself to the bacteria living under your foot?
Yes, I think you can believe in God and in evolution. But if your definition of evolution is purely scientific and material, then 13.7B years of galactic evolution and 3.5B years of DNA based evolution for the purposes of creating a highly imperfectly evolved species to be the momentary masters of a spec of dust on a spec of dust on a spec of dust for a blink of an eye is ridiculous. This is why, I think, you have a very hard time finding a theist who believes in a purely scientific, unguided, natural, and un-intentional evolutionary process.
Once you inject God into the equation and say that evolution was guided by the divine, you and I are no longer using the same definition of 'evolution'. My evolution is a scientific theory. If yours requires God to work, it is not a scientific theory.
I think I see where you are coming from and I do believe that I was in your shoes at one point in time. I think that it is an unstable position though - the version of evolution you subscribe to or find compelling questions the nature of that position in very different ways.
