quote:
I agreed with most except for the tax crap. The IRS and federal government is more corrupt than the televangelist. They don't give you a choice. So I don't think taxing these guys would make a difference.
quote:
They should be taxed if not outlawed.
quote:You are correct. I think what pisses people off about televangelists more than just garden variety scam artists is that everyone hates a hypocrite. Televangelists are hypocrites and scum. It reminds me of the incident a few years ago where Joel Osteen and his wife were flying to Aspen, CO (IN FIRST CLASS) and his wife slapped a flight attendant for not cleaning up a spill fast enough. Seems real Christian of them. Of course given what we just watched, maybe the Osteens should be praised for being "frugal" by: 1) Flying on an airline and not on a G6) and 2) Only going to Aspen and not St. Moritz.
This is getting attention because using religion to defraud people (a) seems bad to religious people and (b) confirms what a lot of non-religious people think about religion.
But the fact is that TV is used to scam people all the time. And scam artists in general tend to manage to evade justice pretty well.
Look at the lives being lived by Jordan Belfort and Danny Porush. Those guys live huge and haven't paid restitution. The feds have chased Kevin Trudeau for 20+years. I think he's in jail now. But his infomercials still run.
Atheists shouldn't be any more upset about this than they would be your typical securities fraud case. This is an issue really only truly religious people have standing to be upset about. For the non-religious, this shouldn't be and isn't different than any other fraud case.
quote:
Joel Osteen and his wife were flying to Aspen, CO (IN FIRST CLASS)
quote:Everyone is different. I do think it is bad even without the slap. They beg for money, then live the high life. It is a free country so if you and others are OK with donating your hard earned money so they can ski in Aspen, more power to you.quote:
Joel Osteen and his wife were flying to Aspen, CO (IN FIRST CLASS)
Since you only bolded this part, am I to assume that you think this is bad enough, even without the slap?
Do you think its ok if you ride first class?
quote:They already do this when it enters their domain. And conning people is in their domain.
You want the government determining proper theology? No thanks.
quote:
Everyone is different. I do think it is bad even without the slap. They beg for money, then live the high life. It is a free country so if you and others are OK with donating your hard earned money so they can ski in Aspen, more power to you.
Do I think it is OK if I ride first class? Sure. But I haven't asked a bunch of poor schmucks to give me money in the name of the Lord. And BTW, the only time I have ridden in first class was when I volunteered to get bumped and they upgraded me for volunteering to wait for a later flight.
quote:James 3:1
I'm curious why people hold pastors to standards they themselves aren't willing to follow. Theologically, all your money is God's right? So, you will be held accountable the same the pastor will be held accountable for his actions. Why do you think you get a pass?
quote:
Atheists shouldn't be any more upset about this than they would be your typical securities fraud case. This is an issue really only truly religious people have standing to be upset about. For the non-religious, this shouldn't be and isn't different than any other fraud case.
quote:
quote:
Atheists shouldn't be any more upset about this than they would be your typical securities fraud case. This is an issue really only truly religious people have standing to be upset about. For the non-religious, this shouldn't be and isn't different than any other fraud case.
Disagree - This particular brand of fraud is terribly psychologically manipulative and damaging. It preys on the weak and ignorant in a very deliberate and unforgiving way. Believers and non-blievers should be equally disturbed.
quote:quote:
quote:
Atheists shouldn't be any more upset about this than they would be your typical securities fraud case. This is an issue really only truly religious people have standing to be upset about. For the non-religious, this shouldn't be and isn't different than any other fraud case.
Disagree - This particular brand of fraud is terribly psychologically manipulative and damaging. It preys on the weak and ignorant in a very deliberate and unforgiving way. Believers and non-blievers should be equally disturbed.
Get rich claims do too.
quote:quote:quote:
quote:
Atheists shouldn't be any more upset about this than they would be your typical securities fraud case. This is an issue really only truly religious people have standing to be upset about. For the non-religious, this shouldn't be and isn't different than any other fraud case.
Disagree - This particular brand of fraud is terribly psychologically manipulative and damaging. It preys on the weak and ignorant in a very deliberate and unforgiving way. Believers and non-blievers should be equally disturbed.
Get rich claims do too.
And believers and non-believers should be equally bothered by these get rich claims. As you say above, fraud is fraud.
quote:I don't understand what point you are trying to make. Con artists are bad and disgusting no matter what the con is.
Right. But this isn't anything more manipulative than online scams that try and convince your computer has a virus so they can sell you their malware.
quote:Moreover, it is a complete distortion of God and the gospel.
Disagree - This particular brand of fraud is terribly psychologically manipulative and damaging. It preys on the weak and ignorant in a very deliberate and unforgiving way. Believers and non-blievers should be equally disturbed.