quote:
Pot-stirrers.
Hopefully no police officers get killed protecting those dumbasses.
quote:free speech is not just for the rich. Free speech must be defended by all or it belongs to noone
Then anyone holding these kinds of events should be required to provide their own armed security if they want to be protected. Or only cops who volunteer should be assigned to be there. Because it's one thing to risk/lose your life protecting someone who ended up in a bad situation innocently. It's quite another to be forced to protect someone who is knowingly poking the bear. That situation in Garland could have been a bloodbath if the radicals had been just a teeny bit smarter.
quote:quote:free speech is not just for the rich. Free speech must be defended by all or it belongs to noone
Then anyone holding these kinds of events should be required to provide their own armed security if they want to be protected. Or only cops who volunteer should be assigned to be there. Because it's one thing to risk/lose your life protecting someone who ended up in a bad situation innocently. It's quite another to be forced to protect someone who is knowingly poking the bear. That situation in Garland could have been a bloodbath if the radicals had been just a teeny bit smarter.
quote:
How about they do whatever the **** they want and excercise their first amendment right to free speech because this America.
quote:the tax payers. It is the cost of having our freedomsquote:quote:free speech is not just for the rich. Free speech must be defended by all or it belongs to noone
Then anyone holding these kinds of events should be required to provide their own armed security if they want to be protected. Or only cops who volunteer should be assigned to be there. Because it's one thing to risk/lose your life protecting someone who ended up in a bad situation innocently. It's quite another to be forced to protect someone who is knowingly poking the bear. That situation in Garland could have been a bloodbath if the radicals had been just a teeny bit smarter.
So who's paying the bill in Ferguson and Baltimore?
quote:It's Arizona. I would bet money that every person who would attend this event will be better armed than any whack-job Muslim extremist who wants to mix it up with them.
Then anyone holding these kinds of events should be required to provide their own armed security if they want to be protected.
quote:it does give you the right and if someone tries to harm you the police should arrest them.
I believe the Constitution gives me the right to use the N-word, but I don't send out a press release every time I use that right.
Of course they have the right to draw pictures of any heathen or heretic they want, but that has nothing to do with being trashy attention-hoes.
quote:quote:
How about they do whatever the **** they want and excercise their first amendment right to free speech because this America.
I don't care what they do, they're perfectly free to do it and not be prosecuted for doing so. But it's absurd for them to expect protection when they are knowingly baiting extremists. That's my opinion. I feel the same way about people who ignore evacuation orders and then expect a firefighter to put his life on the line to save them. The decided they knew better than the authorities, so they should be on their own in that situation.
quote:
It is nothing but radical hate speech. By the way not all speech is protected by the first amendment. They are just trying to incite violence. It is ridiculous and childish.
quote:
I think I will just draw pictures of Jesus getting butt raped by Mohammad and hold rallies where we all hang out and draw similar pictures. Oh and the police can protect me from the "radical" Christians who get pissed about it.