Taylor Bertolet
Texas A&M
#24
K/P

Taylor Bertolet

Kicker/Punter
5′9″ / 188 lbs
Reading, PA
Senior (RS)
Rating: n/a
?
National Avg
Rating: 79.7
?

News Feed

Hop's Top 10 A&M football games against the Arkansas Razorbacks
7 mo ago by David Sandhop
Hop's Top 10 A&M football games against the Arkansas Razorbacks
With another Southwest Classic between Texas A&M and Arkansas at AT&T Stadium due up on Saturday, David Sandhop presents his top 10 list of Aggie football games played against the Razorbacks since the series began back in 1903.
No role too Small: Reliable kicking is vital to A&M's title chances
3 yr ago by Olin Buchanan
No role too Small: Reliable kicking is vital to A&M's title chances
While offensive and defensive stars receive most of the glory, the kickers are oftentimes forgotten pieces of the puzzle. However, a strong and accurate kicker can make a world of difference, and Texas A&M hopes to be able to lean on Seth Small if need be.
Texas A&M 25, Vanderbilt 0: Offense in review
8 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Texas A&M 25, Vanderbilt 0: Offense in review
Yes, drops were an issue. And indeed, stalling out in the red zone on so many occasions will be more costly against LSU. Still, behind a revitalized Kyle Allen, a relentless Tra Carson and re-emerging Speedy Noil and Josh Reynolds, the Texas A&M offense has life.
Assessing the Aggies, Part II: Run D, linebackers & A&M's place in the West
8 yr ago by Billy Liucci
Assessing the Aggies, Part II: Run D, linebackers & A&M's place in the West
Texas A&M's run defense continues to degenerate and answers aren't within immediate sight. Improvement will come for the Aggie D, but it may not be complete until 2016 — and by that point, will A&M be ready to challenge the SEC West's elite?
Post-Game Review: Auburn 26, Texas A&M 10
8 yr ago by Olin Buchanan
Post-Game Review: Auburn 26, Texas A&M 10
On a cold, rainy night at Kyle Field on Saturday the Aggies played uninspired, falling behind early and never mounting much of a threat. A&M allowed 311 rushing yards in a disappointing loss that dropped it further back in the SEC West.
All Updates

Videos

(13 Total)
Detailing the A&M special teams unit with Terence Kitchens
Exclusive: Kevin Sumlin assesses spring results, Part I
News & notes from Day 9 of spring practice
Spring Day 8: Sumlin talks new additions, latest results
Looking at the top-five 'stars to be' in the 2013 football season
Former A&M kicker takes mechanical look at Bertolet's struggles
Improving throughout the season, looking ahead to Auburn
Game Preview: #18 Texas A&M vs. #6 LSU
Game Preview: #22 Texas A&M vs. #23 Louisiana Tech
Game Preview: Texas A&M vs. SMU
One-on-One: Randy Bullock gets personal
Fall Camp: Randy Bullock ready after healthy offseason
Fall Camp: Sherman sizes up Ags after Day 9

Photos

(56 Total)
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.