Forward
6′10″
/
255 lbs
Brockton, MA
UMass
Graduate
3/28/2024
Reed Report: Taking stock of Texas A&M's 2023-2024 campaign
3/18/2024
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Radio (Monday, March 18)
3/17/2024
Rapid Reaction: The Maroon & White are back in March Madness
3/15/2024
French: Aggies need to create 'organized chaos' to upset Kentucky
3/11/2024
Williams & Co. understand there is 'work to do' heading to SEC Tournament
3/8/2024
Mark French talks A&M's season-finale in Oxford, postseason position
2/19/2024
Buzz Williams discusses A&M basketball's 'roughest' week of the season
1/19/2024
Former guard Mark French details A&M's miscues in the 1-3 SEC start
1/18/2024
Reed Report: Highs & lows of beating the Cats before falling to the Hogs
1/16/2024
Last-second lapse causes another painful loss in Fayetteville for A&M
1/15/2024
Williams: A&M's resilience on display in overtime thriller vs. Kentucky
1/5/2024
French analyzes A&M's non-conference slate as SEC play begins Saturday
12/14/2023
Reed Report: Playing 'just OK' on Sunday & keys against the Coogs
12/8/2023
Mark French offers his thoughts on Texas A&M's non-conference play
12/4/2023
Buzz Williams and A&M hoops look forward to week at Reed Arena
11/29/2023
Cold shooting, turnovers doom No. 14 Texas A&M at Virginia, 59-47
11/20/2023
Buzz Williams & Co. seek more road success at ESPN Events Invitational
11/16/2023
Reed Report: No. 13 A&M's 3-0 start, tune-up or trap vs. ORU & more
10/26/2023
Transfers poised to help A&M meet lofty expectations this season
10/18/2023
Williams' philosophy remains consistent amid heightened expectations
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.